| Summary: | RFE: yum install vs. yum upgrade behave different for cross arch upgrades from 64 => 32 bit. | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 | Reporter: | dipu <ddevaraj> |
| Component: | yum | Assignee: | Packaging Maintenance Team <packaging-team-maint> |
| Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | BaseOS QE Security Team <qe-baseos-security> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | 6.5 | CC: | james.antill, yjog |
| Target Milestone: | rc | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2014-03-24 15:55:18 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
|
Description
dipu
2013-11-05 09:48:17 UTC
> yum update suitesparse shoudln't try to install suitesparse.i686 0:3.4.0-8.el6 as an update of suitesparse-3.4.0-7.el6.x86_64 It's a newer version, why wouldn't it be installed? > yum install package and yum update package should give same result They should, but this is a weird corner case ... the recommended way to change arches is to use a versioned obsoletes. At which point yum install would do the same thing. In this case yum install is getting confused because of the arch difference and the fact that the latest version of the default arch is installed. While the commands do behave differently, and we try hard to make them behave the same way ... this is a very corner case and would be resolved by fixing the packaging. |