Bug 1026995

Summary:	[RFE] Snapshot deletion does not show progress
Product:	Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization Manager	Reporter:	Peter Manzella <pmanzell>
Component:	RFEs	Assignee:	Scott Herold <sherold>
Status:	CLOSED DUPLICATE	QA Contact:	Aharon Canan <acanan>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	3.1.0	CC:	acanan, amureini, iheim, lpeer, meverett, rbalakri, rmcswain, yeylon, ylavi
Target Milestone:	ovirt-4.0.0-alpha	Keywords:	FutureFeature, Improvement
Target Release:	---	Flags:	sherold: Triaged+ lsvaty: testing_plan_complete-
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:	storage
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Enhancement
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2016-01-27 11:26:44 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	Storage	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:	910729, 1080372
Bug Blocks:	529086

Description Peter Manzella 2013-11-05 20:15:30 UTC

Description of problem: Deleting a snapshot does not have any indication of progress. For example, deleting a snapshot of a 2TB disk may take 24+ hours to complete without any indication of status.


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible: 100%


Steps to Reproduce:
1.Create a snapshot for a virtual machine guest.
2.Delete the snapshot.
3.There is no indication of the progress until the delete finishes.

Actual results: No progress indicator


Expected results: Indication of relative progress.


Additional info: Although there are single RFEs requesting progress indicators on numerous operations, it would appear that an RFE for each discrete progress indicator might more closely map to the development process.

Comment 2 Robert McSwain 2014-10-11 15:18:42 UTC

Any chance of this being picked up for 3.5 or 3.6? This is still a highly sought after request from customers. Thanks!

Comment 3 Allon Mureinik 2014-11-30 17:10:50 UTC

The new task system planned for 3.6 may enable this. On our radar.

Comment 7 Yaniv Lavi 2016-01-27 11:26:44 UTC


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 529086 ***