Bug 1028360

Summary:	installation of sblim-sfcb : CIM_ElementCapabilities: syntax error
Product:	Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7	Reporter:	Petr Sklenar <psklenar>
Component:	sblim-sfcb	Assignee:	Vitezslav Crhonek <vcrhonek>
Status:	CLOSED WONTFIX	QA Contact:	BaseOS QE - Apps <qe-baseos-apps>
Severity:	high	Docs Contact:
Priority:	high
Version:	7.0	CC:	jscotka, psklenar, tsmetana
Target Milestone:	rc
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2020-12-15 07:28:15 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	922084

Description Petr Sklenar 2013-11-08 09:49:27 UTC

Description of problem:
There is an error during installation of sblim-sfcb

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
sblim-sfcb-1.3.16-7.el7.x86_64

How reproducible:
always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. yum reinstall sblim-sfcb


Actual results:
 yum reinstall sblim-sfcb
Loaded plugins: product-id, subscription-manager
This system is not registered to Red Hat Subscription Management. You can use subscription-manager to register.
Resolving Dependencies
--> Running transaction check
---> Package sblim-sfcb.x86_64 0:1.3.16-7.el7 will be reinstalled
--> Finished Dependency Resolution

Dependencies Resolved

=============================================================================================================================================================
 Package                              Arch                             Version                                 Repository                               Size
=============================================================================================================================================================
Reinstalling:
 sblim-sfcb                           x86_64                           1.3.16-7.el7                            beaker-Server                           492 k

Transaction Summary
=============================================================================================================================================================
Reinstall  1 Package

Total size: 492 k
Installed size: 1.7 M
Is this ok [y/d/N]: y
Downloading packages:
Running transaction check
Running transaction test
Transaction test succeeded
Running transaction
  Installing : sblim-sfcb-1.3.16-7.el7.x86_64                                                                                                            1/1 
error in /var/lib/sfcb/stage/mofs/root/cimv2/Linux_BaseIndication.mof line 8 near CIM_ElementCapabilities: syntax error
Failed compiling the MOF files.
  Verifying  : sblim-sfcb-1.3.16-7.el7.x86_64                                                                                                            1/1 

Installed:
  sblim-sfcb.x86_64 0:1.3.16-7.el7                                                                                                                           

Complete!


Expected results:
no such an error during installation

Additional info:

Comment 2 Vitezslav Crhonek 2013-11-11 15:27:00 UTC

I'm not able to reproduce the issue.

But it looks like a fail of "sfcbrepos -f" command in sfcb post install script due to wrong/corrupted staging files (running "sfcbrepos -f" as root should give you same error message).

"Linux_BaseIndication.mof" file is not part of sblim-sfcb, it is shipped in sblim-cmpi-base... Have you installed sblim-cmpi-base package before reinstalling sblim-sfcb? (I don't see it in steps to reproduce.)

Did you check the content of /var/lib/sfcb/stage/mofs/root/cimv2/Linux_BaseIndication.mof? Is the syntax correct? Could you please attach it?

Comment 3 Vitezslav Crhonek 2013-11-11 15:28:44 UTC

Huh, now I'm looking at the topic - "installation of sblim-sfcb : CIM_ElementCapabilities: syntax error" - this is somehow related or what?

Comment 5 Ludek Smid 2014-06-26 10:48:53 UTC

This request was resolved in Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7.0.

Contact your manager or support representative in case you have further questions about the request.

Comment 6 Ludek Smid 2014-06-26 11:14:04 UTC

The comment above is incorrect. The correct version is bellow.
I'm sorry for any inconvenience.
---------------------------------------------------------------

This request was NOT resolved in Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7.0.

Contact your manager or support representative in case you need
to escalate this bug.

Comment 8 RHEL Program Management 2020-12-15 07:28:15 UTC

After evaluating this issue, there are no plans to address it further or fix it in an upcoming release.  Therefore, it is being closed.  If plans change such that this issue will be fixed in an upcoming release, then the bug can be reopened.