| Summary: | Edit logical network dialog looks way different depending on where it is invoked | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [oVirt] ovirt-engine | Reporter: | mrao | ||||
| Component: | Frontend.WebAdmin | Assignee: | Eliraz Levi <elevi> | ||||
| Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | bugs <bugs> | ||||
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |||||
| Priority: | low | ||||||
| Version: | --- | CC: | bugs, danken, ecohen, elevi, gklein, masayag, mgoldboi, mrao, myakove, nyechiel, plightfoot, rbalakri, sbonazzo, yeylon, ylavi | ||||
| Target Milestone: | ovirt-4.0.0-alpha | Keywords: | UserExperience | ||||
| Target Release: | --- | Flags: | ylavi:
needinfo?
ylavi: ovirt-4.0.0? ylavi: planning_ack? ylavi: devel_ack? ylavi: testing_ack? |
||||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||||||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||||||
| Whiteboard: | network | ||||||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |||||
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||
| Last Closed: | 2015-12-03 08:14:03 UTC | Type: | Bug | ||||
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||
| oVirt Team: | Network | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||
|
Description
mrao
2013-11-08 18:55:31 UTC
setting target release to current version for consideration and review. please do not push non-RFE bugs to an undefined target release to make sure bugs are reviewed for relevancy, fix, closure, etc. I personally don't agree that this should resonate the form of other network dialogs, because this is, as you mentioned, in a different context where other parameters are most relevant. However, I agree that it makes perfect sense to show these fields (VLAN, MTU, etc.) in the dialog even if they're not modifiable, and using the design of the other network dialogs might be the path of least coding. This week I looked carefully at the code, and while everything Malini described is doable, it looks to me like too big of a hassle for the gain; as I had stated, I don't see it as a big issue that the dialog looks different from the edit logical network dialog, as their function is completely different. I think we should just figure out which parameters are important to show in the context of configuring a network on a host, and show these. Nir, what do you think? Which parameters that don't show today are pertinent? Edit Logical Network from the DC (or Networks main tab) level is different from the Edit Network from the "Setup Host Network" context: In the former, you are actually editing the Logical Network business entity; in the latter, you are editing the parameters of the connection between the Logical Network and the physical layer component in the Host to which this Network is connected to (NIC, Bond, etc.). Having a pencil icon on the Network box in the Setup Host Networks dialog is indeed misleading, as the user may think that he is editing the Logical Network itself. One possible improvement is to change the pencil icon to something else (e.g. something that represents a connection) and edit the icon's tool-tip and dialog title to something other than "Edit Network" - maybe something like "configure connection to network" or something similar (maybe Nir can help here). Pushing back because related to other visual changes in the dialog that won't take place in 3.5. Created attachment 922236 [details]
mockup: Setup Host Networks [V9]
(In reply to Einav Cohen from comment #4) > ... > One possible improvement is to change the pencil icon to something else > (e.g. something that represents a connection) and edit the icon's tool-tip > and dialog title to something other than "Edit Network" - maybe something > like "configure connection to network" or something similar (maybe Nir can > help here). in the latest mock-ups for the Setup Host Network dialog (see attachment 922236 [details]) there is no longer a pencil icon - a gearwheel icon replaces it. this should resolve the issue reported in this BZ. This is an automated message. This Bugzilla report has been opened on a version which is not maintained anymore. Please check if this bug is still relevant in oVirt 3.5.4. If it's not relevant anymore, please close it (you may use EOL or CURRENT RELEASE resolution) If it's an RFE please update the version to 4.0 if still relevant. Does this recreate on latest 3.6? Target release should be placed once a package build is known to fix a issue. Since this bug is not modified, the target version has been reset. Please use target milestone to plan a fix for a oVirt release. I do not think it is important to include DC-level properties of a network when editing its host attachment. DC-level properties show up as a tooltip when hovering over it in the SetupNetworks dialog. |