Bug 1029823

Summary: avc appears on starting sssd from cmdline
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 Reporter: Kaushik Banerjee <kbanerje>
Component: selinux-policyAssignee: Miroslav Grepl <mgrepl>
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG QA Contact: BaseOS QE Security Team <qe-baseos-security>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 7.0CC: jhrozek, mmalik
Target Milestone: rc   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2013-11-25 13:10:53 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Kaushik Banerjee 2013-11-13 10:08:14 UTC
Description of problem:
avc appears on starting sssd from cmdline

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
selinux-policy-3.12.1-99.el7
sssd-1.11.1-2.el7

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Run sssd from cmdline:
sssd -d 9 -f -c /root/sssd.conf


Actual results:
sssd starts, but AVCs appear.

type=SYSCALL msg=audit(1384262991.823:1464): arch=c000003e syscall=42 success=no exit=-13 a0=10 a1=7fff4bf79850 a2=6e a3=1 items=0 ppid=1 pid=546 auid=4294967295 uid=0 gid=0 euid=0 suid=0 fsuid=0 egid=0 sgid=0 fsgid=0 tty=(none) ses=4294967295 comm="systemd-logind" exe="/usr/lib/systemd/systemd-logind" subj=system_u:system_r:systemd_logind_t:s0 key=(null)
type=AVC msg=audit(1384262991.823:1464): avc:  denied  { connectto } for  pid=546 comm="systemd-logind" path="/var/lib/sss/pipes/nss" scontext=system_u:system_r:systemd_logind_t:s0 tcontext=unconfined_u:system_r:unconfined_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023 tclass=unix_stream_socket


Expected results:
No avcs

Additional info:

Comment 1 Jakub Hrozek 2013-11-13 10:23:57 UTC
I'll let Miroslav do the canonical answer, but I think that's kind of expected as processes not started by the init system do not transition from the unconfined domain..

Comment 3 Miroslav Grepl 2013-11-25 13:10:53 UTC
(In reply to Jakub Hrozek from comment #1)
> I'll let Miroslav do the canonical answer, but I think that's kind of
> expected as processes not started by the init system do not transition from
> the unconfined domain..

Yes.