Bug 1030466
Summary: | [engine-dwh] ovirt-engine-dwh-setup should stored values provided in interactive setup in the answer file | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization Manager | Reporter: | Barak Dagan <bdagan> |
Component: | ovirt-engine-dwh | Assignee: | Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Barak Dagan <bdagan> |
Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | 3.3.0 | CC: | acathrow, adahms, bdagan, iheim, pstehlik, Rhev-m-bugs, sbonazzo, yeylon, ylavi |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | 3.4.0 | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | integration | ||
Fixed In Version: | ovirt-3.4.0-beta3 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
Doc Text: |
The engine-setup command now automatically generates answer files for configuration of the data warehouse based on the values entered during interactive setup.
|
Story Points: | --- |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2014-06-09 15:16:16 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | 1058012 | ||
Bug Blocks: | 1025336, 1078909, 1142926 |
Description
Barak Dagan
2013-11-14 14:03:30 UTC
Since the answer file handling was added for QA automation I think we can postpone this to 3.4 when the migration to otopi will join engine-setup answerfile and dwh answer file in the same one. @Barak I think you misinterpreting the purpose of the answer file. The *sole* purpose of the generated answerfile is to provide you with the possible options that can be set in it. Then you would you this file to perform an unattended installation. The dwh/reports setup do not touch the answerfile after it's created. So I don't think this bug is valid. @Alex I don't see anywhere that the dwh/reports setup touched the answer file, on the contrary, I'd expect it to recreate one during the installation - as the engine setup does. Second, I don't understand what is the point of manually generating list of options with none values. Such a file can be packed in the beginning. When a user Performs an action after the installation, he might expect that his values will be generated as well - like the new engine setup does. If this is too complicated to be done in the current version, you can accept Sandro's suggestion to delay it to the next one. @Sandro This bug is a check point for implementing post-install answer file in dwh/reports with otopi. Verified on av2 rhevm-dwh-3.4.0-0.4.master.20140224152332.el6ev.noarch rhevm-dwh-setup-3.4.0-0.4.master.20140224152332.el6ev.noarch rhevm-reports-3.4.0-0.4.master.20140226133324.el6ev.noarch rhevm-reports-setup-3.4.0-0.4.master.20140226133324.el6ev.noarch jasperreports-server-pro-5.5.0-7.el6ev.noarch Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2014-0601.html |