Bug 103221

Summary: RHEL3/IPF/B1 : multiple Intel LAN cards cause kernel stack dump
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 3 Reporter: Larry Troan <ltroan>
Component: kernelAssignee: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik>
Status: CLOSED WORKSFORME QA Contact: Brian Brock <bbrock>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 3.0CC: ichute, mansing.li, peterm, petrides, riel, tao
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: ia64   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2005-10-05 23:34:14 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 101028    
Attachments:
Description Flags
lanerr.txt
none
lspci_lan.txt
none
lspci_vv_lan.txt none

Description Larry Troan 2003-08-27 20:52:25 UTC 
Anaconda will not install on a zx6000 with an on board Intel Moab chip with an
additional Intel LAN e100 pro PCI card in the system.   lspci, lspci -vv, and
system console output included.  (Lanerr.txt - system console output.)

For a zx2000, install B1 without any additional LAN PCI card, the installation
works fine.  Power off.  Add an additional Intel e100 pro LAN card (same as
above).   Reboot.  Stack trace.  Similar to lanerr.txt above.
----------
Action by: mansing.li
Issue Registered
----------
Action by: mansing.li


Status set to: Waiting on Tech
File uploaded: lanerr.txt

----------
Action by: mansing.li


File uploaded: lspci_lan.txt

----------
Action by: mansing.li


File uploaded: lspci_vv_lan.txt


ISSUE TRACKER 27042 opened as sev 2.
Comment 1 Larry Troan 2003-08-27 20:54:30 UTC 
Mansing, I need the exact code level you used to produce this bug. Was it the
Beta1+sushiIPF refresh? What kernel?
Comment 2 Larry Troan 2003-08-27 20:55:05 UTC 
Created attachment 93996 [details]
lanerr.txt
Comment 3 Larry Troan 2003-08-27 20:55:22 UTC 
Created attachment 93997 [details]
lspci_lan.txt
Comment 4 Larry Troan 2003-08-27 20:55:41 UTC 
Created attachment 93998 [details]
lspci_vv_lan.txt
Comment 5 Arjan van de Ven 2003-08-27 21:03:41 UTC 
Does B2 do better?
Comment 6 Larry Troan 2003-08-27 21:17:25 UTC 
FROM ISSUE TRACKER...
Event posted 08-27-2003 05:09pm by mansing.li with duration of 0.00
Larry, this is on Beta 1.  Not +sushi.  Will test with Beta 2.  As soon as we
get sushi, we will test with Beta 2 + sushi.  Mansing
Comment 7 Jeff Garzik 2005-02-18 07:32:08 UTC 
Is this still a problem?
Comment 8 Ernie Petrides 2005-10-05 23:34:14 UTC 
Closing due to lack of response.