Bug 1032628

Summary: Symbol lookup in elf/dl-lookup.c results in returning wrong values
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 Reporter: Deepu K S <dkochuka>
Component: glibcAssignee: Siddhesh Poyarekar <spoyarek>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Arjun Shankar <ashankar>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 6.4CC: ashankar, dkochuka, fweimer, mfranc, mnewsome, pfrankli, spoyarek
Target Milestone: rcKeywords: Patch
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: glibc-2.12-1.136.el6 Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2014-10-14 04:42:30 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 994246, 1023566, 1056252    
Attachments:
Description Flags
Customer Test Case
none
Patch none

Description Deepu K S 2013-11-20 13:53:06 UTC
Description of problem:
Symbol lookup in elf/dl-lookup.c (dl_lookup_x) incorrectly handles combination of STB_GNU_UNIQUE binding and ELF_RTYPE_CLASS_COPY relocation resulting in returning wrong values, leading to copy relocation effectively not being made.

This bug was reported earlier was fixed in glibc-2.13
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12510

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6.4
glibc-2.12-1.107.el6_4.4.x86_64

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:

$ cat lib.h
template<typename T> struct S {
    static int i;
};


$ cat lib.cc
#include "lib.h"
template<typename T> int S<T>::i = 1;
static int i = S<char>::i;


$ cat test.cc
#include "lib.h"
#include <cstdio>
int main() {
    std::printf("%d\n", S<char>::i);
    return 0;
}

$ gcc -shared -fPIC -o lib.so lib.cc
$ gcc -o test test.cc lib.so -lstdc++

Actual results:
$ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=. ./test
0

Expected results:
$ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=. ./test
1

Additional info:
This issue was reported by our customer. The test cases performed at their end are attached.

I have tested the patch at my end by rebuilding glibc and could find that the patch fixes the issue.

# Without patch
/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 --library-path .:/lib64:/usr/lib64 ./test
0

# With patch included
/opt/glibc/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 --library-path .:/lib64:/usr/lib64 ./test
1

The patch is also attached to this bug report.

Comment 2 Deepu K S 2013-11-20 13:55:32 UTC
Created attachment 826658 [details]
Customer Test Case

Comment 3 Deepu K S 2013-11-20 13:57:10 UTC
Created attachment 826659 [details]
Patch

Comment 7 errata-xmlrpc 2014-10-14 04:42:30 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2014-1391.html