Bug 1032838

Summary: [abrt] codeblocks-12.11-2.fc20: Unlock: Process /usr/bin/codeblocks was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Fang Junwei <fjw201198>
Component: codeblocksAssignee: Dan HorĂ¡k <dan>
Status: CLOSED EOL QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 20CC: 52wz1h, andrei.dragomirescu, ChristopherLeeUS, cristian.ciupitu, dan, dimityr_7, efix.fx, ekuric, gbonnema, hk.stefansson, i, isaiasc3, kpusmo, kschueff.t, mithrial, moerbius, mstawiarski, nieric, novatw, rfilippetti1, root-kits, s2, serega.belarus, shawnx, sparsa.roychowdhury, thegreatgotz
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: x86_64   
OS: Unspecified   
URL: https://retrace.fedoraproject.org/faf/reports/bthash/68b9227c12ad040d932efb8b7b2b4396dda5bce1
Whiteboard: abrt_hash:51f190bffe56627bd175e83eb33b1fa2a9dfaa02
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2015-06-30 12:27:16 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Attachments:
Description Flags
File: backtrace
none
File: cgroup
none
File: core_backtrace
none
File: dso_list
none
File: environ
none
File: exploitable
none
File: limits
none
File: maps
none
File: open_fds
none
File: proc_pid_status
none
File: var_log_messages none

Description Fang Junwei 2013-11-21 01:00:16 UTC
Version-Release number of selected component:
codeblocks-12.11-2.fc20

Additional info:
reporter:       libreport-2.1.9
backtrace_rating: 4
cmdline:        codeblocks
crash_function: Unlock
executable:     /usr/bin/codeblocks
kernel:         3.11.6-301.fc20.x86_64
runlevel:       unknown
type:           CCpp
uid:            1000

Truncated backtrace:
Thread no. 1 (10 frames)
 #2 Unlock at /usr/include/wx-2.8/wx/string.h:243
 #3 ~wxStringBase at /usr/include/wx-2.8/wx/string.h:396
 #4 ~wxString at /usr/include/wx-2.8/wx/string.h:659
 #5 ~pair at /usr/include/c++/4.8.1/bits/stl_pair.h:96
 #6 destroy at /usr/include/c++/4.8.1/ext/new_allocator.h:133
 #7 _M_destroy_node at /usr/include/c++/4.8.1/bits/stl_tree.h:395
 #8 std::_Rb_tree<wxString, std::pair<wxString const, SquirrelObject>, std::_Select1st<std::pair<wxString const, SquirrelObject> >, std::less<wxString>, std::allocator<std::pair<wxString const, SquirrelObject> > >::_M_erase at /usr/include/c++/4.8.1/bits/stl_tree.h:1127
 #9 __cxa_finalize at cxa_finalize.c:56
 #10 __do_global_dtors_aux at /lib64/libcodeblocks.so.0
 #11 ??

Comment 1 Fang Junwei 2013-11-21 01:00:33 UTC
Created attachment 826902 [details]
File: backtrace

Comment 2 Fang Junwei 2013-11-21 01:00:37 UTC
Created attachment 826903 [details]
File: cgroup

Comment 3 Fang Junwei 2013-11-21 01:00:42 UTC
Created attachment 826904 [details]
File: core_backtrace

Comment 4 Fang Junwei 2013-11-21 01:00:46 UTC
Created attachment 826905 [details]
File: dso_list

Comment 5 Fang Junwei 2013-11-21 01:00:50 UTC
Created attachment 826906 [details]
File: environ

Comment 6 Fang Junwei 2013-11-21 01:00:55 UTC
Created attachment 826907 [details]
File: exploitable

Comment 7 Fang Junwei 2013-11-21 01:01:02 UTC
Created attachment 826908 [details]
File: limits

Comment 8 Fang Junwei 2013-11-21 01:01:09 UTC
Created attachment 826909 [details]
File: maps

Comment 9 Fang Junwei 2013-11-21 01:01:13 UTC
Created attachment 826910 [details]
File: open_fds

Comment 10 Fang Junwei 2013-11-21 01:01:17 UTC
Created attachment 826911 [details]
File: proc_pid_status

Comment 11 Fang Junwei 2013-11-21 01:01:21 UTC
Created attachment 826912 [details]
File: var_log_messages

Comment 12 Farid 2013-12-07 18:46:42 UTC
chaque demmarrage de Skype et il m'est un son qui ne cesse pas de s'arreter...

reporter:       libreport-2.1.9
backtrace_rating: 4
cmdline:        codeblocks
crash_function: Unlock
executable:     /usr/bin/codeblocks
kernel:         3.11.10-300.fc20.x86_64
package:        codeblocks-12.11-2.fc20
reason:         Process /usr/bin/codeblocks was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
runlevel:       N 5
type:           CCpp
uid:            1000

Comment 13 A.J. Bonnema 2013-12-29 09:54:28 UTC
Another user experienced a similar problem:

I opened up an existing project with a very simple program in it and no external dependencies. 
When I closed the program it dumped core. I had not done anything special, not even compiled, just checked out sources
that were already open when I opened the project.

reporter:       libreport-2.1.10
backtrace_rating: 4
cmdline:        codeblocks
crash_function: Unlock
executable:     /usr/bin/codeblocks
kernel:         3.12.5-302.fc20.x86_64
package:        codeblocks-12.11-2.fc20
reason:         codeblocks killed by SIGSEGV
runlevel:       N 5
type:           CCpp
uid:            1000

Comment 14 thegreatgotz 2014-01-05 18:29:34 UTC
Another user experienced a similar problem:

Opened the app, then closed it with no modification, and the crash message appeared.

reporter:       libreport-2.1.10
backtrace_rating: 4
cmdline:        codeblocks
crash_function: Unlock
executable:     /usr/bin/codeblocks
kernel:         3.12.6-300.fc20.x86_64
package:        codeblocks-12.11-2.fc20
reason:         codeblocks killed by SIGSEGV
runlevel:       N 5
type:           CCpp
uid:            1000

Comment 15 Isaias Lourenco 2014-01-11 17:51:04 UTC
Another user experienced a similar problem:

just exited the application

reporter:       libreport-2.1.10
backtrace_rating: 4
cmdline:        /usr/bin/codeblocks
crash_function: Unlock
executable:     /usr/bin/codeblocks
kernel:         3.12.6-300.fc20.x86_64
package:        codeblocks-12.11-2.fc20
reason:         codeblocks killed by SIGSEGV
runlevel:       N 5
type:           CCpp
uid:            1000

Comment 16 Sparsa 2014-01-12 16:16:24 UTC
Another user experienced a similar problem:

suddenly crashed when I want to close the program

reporter:       libreport-2.1.11
backtrace_rating: 4
cmdline:        codeblocks
crash_function: Unlock
executable:     /usr/bin/codeblocks
kernel:         3.12.6-300.fc20.x86_64
package:        codeblocks-12.11-2.fc20
reason:         codeblocks killed by SIGSEGV
runlevel:       N 5
type:           CCpp
uid:            1000

Comment 17 mithrial 2014-02-18 14:59:48 UTC
Another user experienced a similar problem:

I saved my session and exited CodeBlocks.

reporter:       libreport-2.1.12
backtrace_rating: 4
cmdline:        codeblocks
crash_function: Unlock
executable:     /usr/bin/codeblocks
kernel:         3.13.3-201.fc20.x86_64
package:        codeblocks-12.11-2.fc20
reason:         codeblocks killed by SIGSEGV
runlevel:       N 5
type:           CCpp
uid:            1000

Comment 18 Efix 2014-02-24 00:04:37 UTC
Another user experienced a similar problem:

Incident survenu lors de la fermeture de code::blocks.

reporter:       libreport-2.1.12
backtrace_rating: 4
cmdline:        codeblocks
crash_function: Unlock
executable:     /usr/bin/codeblocks
kernel:         3.13.3-201.fc20.x86_64
package:        codeblocks-12.11-2.fc20
reason:         codeblocks killed by SIGSEGV
runlevel:       N 5
type:           CCpp
uid:            1000

Comment 19 Efix 2014-03-01 01:01:00 UTC
Another user experienced a similar problem:

Open and close code::blocks via the menu.

reporter:       libreport-2.1.12
backtrace_rating: 4
cmdline:        codeblocks
crash_function: Unlock
executable:     /usr/bin/codeblocks
kernel:         3.13.3-201.fc20.x86_64
package:        codeblocks-12.11-2.fc20
reason:         codeblocks killed by SIGSEGV
runlevel:       N 5
type:           CCpp
uid:            1000

Comment 20 Christopher Meng 2014-03-01 02:52:18 UTC
This bug has been fixed in 13.12 version which is not pushed to f20.

Dan, any plan?

Comment 21 Kristjan Stefansson 2014-03-25 04:58:01 UTC
Another user experienced a similar problem:

First time running the application, ran a template program and exited

reporter:       libreport-2.2.0
backtrace_rating: 4
cmdline:        /usr/bin/codeblocks
crash_function: Unlock
executable:     /usr/bin/codeblocks
kernel:         3.13.6-200.fc20.x86_64
package:        codeblocks-12.11-2.fc20
reason:         codeblocks killed by SIGSEGV
runlevel:       N 5
type:           CCpp
uid:            1000

Comment 22 root-kits 2014-04-17 04:02:57 UTC
Another user experienced a similar problem:

just installed codeblocks, noticed an error found in package codeblocks

reporter:       libreport-2.2.1
backtrace_rating: 4
cmdline:        codeblocks
crash_function: Unlock
executable:     /usr/bin/codeblocks
kernel:         3.13.9-200.fc20.x86_64
package:        codeblocks-12.11-2.fc20
reason:         codeblocks killed by SIGSEGV
runlevel:       N 5
type:           CCpp
uid:            1000

Comment 23 Andrei Dragomirescu 2014-08-21 10:45:20 UTC
Another user experienced a similar problem:

The problem occured when I closed codeblocks. Maybe I should mention that I started the program in a terminal window.

reporter:       libreport-2.2.3
backtrace_rating: 4
cmdline:        codeblocks
crash_function: Unlock
executable:     /usr/bin/codeblocks
kernel:         3.15.6-200.fc20.x86_64
package:        codeblocks-12.11-2.fc20
reason:         codeblocks killed by SIGSEGV
runlevel:       N 5
type:           CCpp
uid:            1000

Comment 24 John McInnes 2014-10-11 07:22:18 UTC
Me too. :/

Comment 25 Cristian Ciupitu 2014-11-23 10:37:58 UTC
According to ABRT it happened to me too when I closed codeblocks after a debug session of a very simple C program (hello world).

Comment 26 Chris 2015-02-10 19:05:17 UTC
Another user experienced a similar problem:

The problem occured when I was simply closing the window. In point of fact, I didn't know that there was a problem at all before the bug report tool popped up.

reporter:       libreport-2.2.3
backtrace_rating: 4
cmdline:        codeblocks
crash_function: Unlock
executable:     /usr/bin/codeblocks
kernel:         3.17.8-200.fc20.x86_64
package:        codeblocks-12.11-2.fc20
reason:         codeblocks killed by SIGSEGV
runlevel:       N 5
type:           CCpp
uid:            1000

Comment 27 Fedora End Of Life 2015-05-29 09:49:08 UTC
This message is a reminder that Fedora 20 is nearing its end of life.
Approximately 4 (four) weeks from now Fedora will stop maintaining
and issuing updates for Fedora 20. It is Fedora's policy to close all
bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time
this bug will be closed as EOL if it remains open with a Fedora  'version'
of '20'.

Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you
plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' 
to a later Fedora version.

Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we were not 
able to fix it before Fedora 20 is end of life. If you would still like 
to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version 
of Fedora, you are encouraged  change the 'version' to a later Fedora 
version prior this bug is closed as described in the policy above.

Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's 
lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a 
more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes 
bugs or makes them obsolete.

Comment 28 Jaroslav Reznik 2015-06-30 12:27:16 UTC
Fedora 20 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2015-06-23. Fedora 20 is
no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further
security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug.

If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of
Fedora please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. If you
are unable to reopen this bug, please file a new report against the
current release. If you experience problems, please add a comment to this
bug.

Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed.