Bug 1033092
Summary: | RFE: Rebase libusbx to the latest upstream release | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 | Reporter: | Hans de Goede <hdegoede> |
Component: | libusbx | Assignee: | Hans de Goede <hdegoede> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Mike Gahagan <mgahagan> |
Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | 7.0 | CC: | ctatman, emcnabb, fidencio, hdegoede, marcandre.lureau, tpelka, trinh.dao, ylavi, yu.zhang16 |
Target Milestone: | rc | Keywords: | FutureFeature, Rebase |
Target Release: | 7.3 | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | libusbx-1.0.20-1.el7 | Doc Type: | Rebase: Bug Fixes and Enhancements |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2016-11-04 06:33:05 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 976685, 1033098, 1033733, 1115797 |
Description
Hans de Goede
2013-11-21 14:31:25 UTC
This rebase bug is intended for 7.1, updating flags to reflect this. Trinh, Is this really something that HPE cares about? Do we need to keep tracking this for you? --Chris Hi Chris, we don't need to track this bug anymore since this bug belongs to yu.zhang16 on bug 1115797. I cannot found Yu on HPE email list. I had remove hpe7.3bugs tracker from this bug. Please follow up with Yu. thanks, trinh libusb has been rebased to 1.0.20, this is fixed in libusbx-1.0.20-1.el7 Confirmed libusbx-1.0.20-1.el7.x86_64 is built and included in recent 7.3 trees. Tested with: RHEL-7.3-20160614.n.0 Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2016-2443.html |