| Summary: | regression in ipa due to patch for ns-slapd stuck in DS_Sleep | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 | Reporter: | Rich Megginson <rmeggins> |
| Component: | 389-ds-base | Assignee: | Rich Megginson <rmeggins> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Sankar Ramalingam <sramling> |
| Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | high | ||
| Version: | 6.4 | CC: | ekeck, jgalipea, lkrispen, mreynolds, msauton, nhosoi, nkinder, nsoman, rmeggins, spoore, tbordaz, tlavigne |
| Target Milestone: | rc | Keywords: | Regression, Reopened, ZStream |
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | 389-ds-base-1.2.11.15-31.el6 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | 1008013 | Environment: | |
| Last Closed: | 2014-10-14 07:52:22 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Bug Depends On: | 1008013 | ||
| Bug Blocks: | 1018893, 1033806, 1034409, 1037271 | ||
|
Comment 1
Rich Megginson
2013-11-22 03:42:25 UTC
This bug is in NEEDINFO, but I don't see a request for info? Never mind - I see NEEDINFO requested from spoore Since this revert is in 389-ds-base-1.2.11.15-31.el6, setting the status to ON_QA. Verification could be done in the same way as for bz1037271. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1037271 Are there any steps to verify this bug? The clone of this bug #1034409 has been marked as Verified as Sanity only. Is that expected to be marked as Verified by IPA team? We never could reproduce the original bug #1034409. We unfortunately did not file a specific bug for the specific problem that the fix for this bug caused in IPA. I suppose if 389-ds-base does not cause any regressions in IPA, then this bug can be verified. As per Rich's previous comment, I would expect the IPA team to mark it as Verified based on their regression/automated tests with the latest 389-ds-base-1.2.11.15-45. Scott's replica-manage tests are looking good in this area - will mark Verified Sanity Only Yes, the tests are looking much better and I've gotten good results back. As a result, I've run ipa-replica-install and ipa-replica-manage now many times and haven't seen this. Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2014-1385.html |