Bug 1033548
| Summary: | [RHEL5] Error : EXT4-fs error (device sda8): ext4_ext_search_left: inode #8126473: (comm db2sysc) ix (60672) != EXT_FIRST_INDEX (0) (depth 1)! leads to DB2 instance to crash | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 | Reporter: | Ludek Smid <lsmid> |
| Component: | e4fsprogs | Assignee: | Eric Sandeen <esandeen> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Eryu Guan <eguan> |
| Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | urgent | ||
| Version: | 5.11 | CC: | atomlin, djeffery, eguan, ekuric, esandeen, fs-maint, jcastillo, jharriga, jsvarova, kdudka, lmcilroy, lmiksik, mgandhi, plambri, pm-eus, rwheeler, sauchter, sct, spanjikk, vincent |
| Target Milestone: | rc | Keywords: | ZStream |
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: |
Previously, the resize4fs utility mishandled the resizing of an ext4 file system to a smaller size. As a consequence, files containing many extents could become corrupted if they were moved during the resize process. With this update, resize4fs now maintains a consistent extent tree when moving files containing many extents, and such files no longer become corrupted in this scenario.
|
Story Points: | --- |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2013-12-05 13:21:37 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | 1014062 | ||
| Bug Blocks: | 961026 | ||
|
Description
Ludek Smid
2013-11-22 11:08:33 UTC
*** Bug 1033201 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** I have this committed in 5.11 and 5.10 now, but for some reason it's not building properly due to the {?dist} tag not expanding properly, AFAICT:
> Could not execute build: e4fsprogs-1.41.12-4.el5 has already been built
Looking into it, should have it built soon.
Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2013-1789.html |