| Summary: | xiphos needs rebuild because gtkhtml3 version update | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora EPEL | Reporter: | Tuomo Soini <tis> | ||||||
| Component: | xiphos | Assignee: | Christopher Meng <i> | ||||||
| Status: | CLOSED EOL | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> | ||||||
| Severity: | urgent | Docs Contact: | |||||||
| Priority: | unspecified | ||||||||
| Version: | el6 | CC: | BobLfoot, dakingun, fredex, i, mcepl | ||||||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||||||||
| Target Release: | --- | ||||||||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||||||||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||||||||
| Whiteboard: | |||||||||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |||||||
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||||
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||||
| Last Closed: | 2020-11-30 15:55:05 UTC | Type: | Bug | ||||||
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||||
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||||
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||||
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||||
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||||
rebuilt from src.rpm on system using gtkhtml3-3.32 and the libgtkhtml-editor-3.14.so.0 library. Appears to work ok. Still waiting for official EPEL build however. I'm having the same problem on Centos 6.5. Trying to figure out whether this is a Centos problem (not having a symlink named libgtkhtml-editor.so.0 as part of the gtkhtml3 rpm, or EPEL for expecting a plain non-version-specific symlink. Created attachment 842130 [details]
This is my rebuild of xiphos 3.1.5-1 on a system with the new .so
Works for me! Thanks! Will this eventually become the "official" epel version? Created attachment 842145 [details]
Source RPM for 3.1.5-1.1
I doubt it Fred as that will be numbered 3.1.5-2 most likely. or something higher hence my reason for using 3.1.5-1.1 as the number. I jsut make it available as is for checkout.
Adding an additional comment to see if there exists an ETA on the rebuild? Hey, we are still waiting for fixing rebuild. tuomo - there is an unsigned rpm in comments 3 & 5 which is "unofficial" It works for fred smith and I. THanks for saying there is more than just 1 person using this tool. Deji is a zombie now Thanks for assuming this Christopher. When I attain packager status, I'll co-manage this if you need/want the help. Well, I haven't know about this bug, so when somebody asked me for help with RHEL-6, I just rebuild the package from EPEL-7 and it is on https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/mcepl/xiphos-epel/builds/ I know it is against EPEL rules, but I don't think a complete rebuild of the Sword stack breaks any packages outside of it. What do you think about rebase? Moreover, the attached src.rpm, doesn't seem to make Koji much happy http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=13557233 This message is a reminder that EPEL 6 is nearing its end of life. Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for EPEL 6 on 2020-11-30. It is our policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as EOL if it remains open with a 'version' of 'el6'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later EPEL version. Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we were not able to fix it before EPEL 6 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora, you are encouraged change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior this bug is closed as described in the policy above. This message is a reminder that EPEL 6 is nearing its end of life. Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for EPEL 6 on 2020-11-30. It is policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as EOL if it remains open with a 'version' of 'el6'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later EPEL version. Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we were not able to fix it before EPEL 6 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version, you are encouraged to change the 'version' to a later version prior this bug is closed as described in the policy above. EPEL el6 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2020-11-30. EPEL el6 is no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug. If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of EPEL please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. If you are unable to reopen this bug, please file a new report against the current release. If you experience problems, please add a comment to this bug. Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed. |
package: xiphos-3.1.5-1.el6.x86_64 from epel unresolved deps: libgtkhtml-editor.so.0()(64bit) gtkhtml3 updated with rhel-6.5, xiphos needs rebuild.