Bug 1035288

Summary:	Update spacewalk-remote-utils with RHEL 6.5 channel definitions
Product:	Red Hat Satellite 5	Reporter:	Tomas Lestach <tlestach>
Component:	Client	Assignee:	Tomas Lestach <tlestach>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	Lukas Pramuk <lpramuk>
Severity:	unspecified	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	560	CC:	ldelouw, lpramuk
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	spacewalk-remote-utils-2.0.1-3	Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2013-12-02 08:14:44 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	924189

Description Tomas Lestach 2013-11-27 13:15:57 UTC

Description of problem:
spacewalk-remote-utils does not contain RHEL 6.5 channel definitions

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
spacewalk-remote-utils-2.0.1-2

Comment 1 Tomas Lestach 2013-11-27 13:25:30 UTC

spacewalk.git: afa8824b1745ab4284bab0b12153ea95d51261cb

Comment 3 Lukas Pramuk 2013-11-27 14:59:54 UTC

VERIFIED. spacewalk-remote-utils-2.0.1-3.el6sat

REPRO:
# spacewalk-create-channel -l admin -s `hostname` -v 6 -u u5 -r Server -a x86_64 -d rhel6u5
Password:
Error: data file '6-u5-server-x86_64' does not exist

vs.

FIX:
# spacewalk-create-channel -l admin -s `hostname` -v 6 -u u5 -r Server -a x86_64 -d rhel6u5
Password: 
You have not specified a source channel, we will try to determine it from inputs
Trying with source channel: rhel-x86_64-server-6
Creating channel, rhel6u5, with arch x86_64 3690 packages in source file to push.
...

Comment 5 errata-xmlrpc 2013-12-02 08:14:44 UTC

Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2013-1777.html