Bug 1035385

Summary: Repair Principals definitions of Security Policy elements in Security Manager section of Security Guide
Product: [JBoss] JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 6 Reporter: FIlip Bogyai <fbogyai>
Component: DocumentationAssignee: Tom WELLS <twells>
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE QA Contact: Ondrej Lukas <olukas>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 6.2.0CC: jcacek, jkudrnac, lcarlon, nziakova, twells
Target Milestone: GAKeywords: Documentation, FutureFeature, Triaged
Target Release: EAP 6.2.2   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Enhancement
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
: 1090315 (view as bug list) Environment:
Build Name: 14876, Security Guide-6.2-1 Build Date: 27-11-2013 14:15:01 Topic ID: 4782-552816 [Latest]
Last Closed: 2014-06-02 12:50:22 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 1035353    

Description FIlip Bogyai 2013-11-27 16:12:53 UTC
In 5.4. Write a Java Security Manager Policy in Basic Information in definition of Principals element configuration there is "If it is omitted, it signifies "any principals"." - I understand this expression in way that

Comment 1 Ondrej Lukas 2013-11-28 06:08:58 UTC
Description of this bz doesn't have any sense, right description is following:

In 5.4. Write a Java Security Manager Policy in Basic Information in definition of Principals element configuration there is "If it is omitted, it signifies "any principals"." - I understand this expression in way that in executing thread must be at least one "any" Principal. I think that this should be better and  understandable "If it is omitted, it means Principals of executing thread have no impact on the Java Security Manager".

Also in "Basic Information" should be mentioned that definitions are connected to policytool - because some of them are incorrect for pure text Security Policy File.

Comment 4 Josef Cacek 2014-04-23 06:53:59 UTC
Verified on stage - Revision 6.2.2-6