Bug 1035520

Summary: gtkhtml3.x86_64 0:3.32.2-2.el6.x86_64 does not provide libgtkhtml-editor.so.0()(64bit) that gtkhtml3-3.28.3-3.el6.x86_64 does
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 Reporter: Robert Lightfoot <BobLfoot>
Component: gtkhtml3Assignee: Matthew Barnes <mbarnes>
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG QA Contact: Desktop QE <desktop-qa-list>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 6.5CC: mcrha, tpelka
Target Milestone: rc   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: x86_64   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2013-11-28 08:37:01 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:

Description Robert Lightfoot 2013-11-28 02:08:35 UTC 
Description of problem:
gtkhtml3.x86_64 0:3.32.2-2.el6.x86_64 does not provide libgtkhtml-editor.so.0()(64bit) that gtkhtml3-3.28.3-3.el6.x86_64 does

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:
every

Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.

Actual results:
No libgtkhtml-editor.so.0()(64bit) in package

Expected results:
libgtkhtml-editor.so.0()(64bit) in package

Additional info:
Comment 2 Milan Crha 2013-11-28 08:37:01 UTC 
Thanks for a bug report. it makes sense the file is gone, the rebased version begun to version the file with API version, thus the new name is:
   libgtkhtml-editor-3.14.so.0

If you depend on it, then you should rebuild your software against the updated gtkhtml3. I believe all standard/default RHEL6 packages depending on it were rebuilt. Am I wrong?
Comment 3 Robert Lightfoot 2013-11-28 12:32:56 UTC 
Looks like I'll need to wait for EPEL to rebuild against new gtkhtml3 then.  Thanks for the information.