| Summary: | Should mesa-vdpau-drivers be multilib? | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Chris Adams <linux> |
| Component: | mash | Assignee: | Dennis Gilmore <dennis> |
| Status: | CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 20 | CC: | ajax, dennis, ignatenko, linux, rvokal |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2014-05-09 18:57:14 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
|
Description
Chris Adams
2013-12-01 01:31:07 UTC
Yes. Is it not? Nope, not in the repos. You can take the i686 RPM and install it on x86_64 just fine, but it is not in the x86_64 repo. For example: disk:7:/srv/mirror/pub/fedora/linux/development/20/x86_64/os/Packages/m$ ls mesa*drivers* mesa-dri-drivers-9.2.3-1.20131114.fc20.i686.rpm mesa-dri-drivers-9.2.3-1.20131114.fc20.x86_64.rpm mesa-vdpau-drivers-9.2.3-1.20131114.fc20.x86_64.rpm DRI drivers have both, but VDPAU do not. That still isn't something I can fix from within the package, afaik. Fix added to upstream git master. This is fixed in the published trees. |