Bug 1036735

Summary:	[RFE] Application-Level HA
Product:	Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization Manager	Reporter:	Scott Herold <sherold>
Component:	RFEs	Assignee:	Vinzenz Feenstra [evilissimo] <vfeenstr>
Status:	CLOSED WONTFIX	QA Contact:	yeylon <yeylon>
Severity:	unspecified	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	unspecified	CC:	amedeo, bugs, dfediuck, ecohen, gklein, howey.vernon, iheim, lpeer, michal.skrivanek, rbalakri, Rhev-m-bugs, sherold, s.kieske, srevivo, vfeenstr, yeylon
Target Milestone:	---	Keywords:	FutureFeature
Target Release:	---	Flags:	sherold: Triaged+
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:	sla
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Enhancement
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:
Clones:	1039170 (view as bug list)		Environment:
Last Closed:	2015-06-07 09:06:07 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	SLA	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	1039170

Description Scott Herold 2013-12-02 14:25:06 UTC

Description of problem:

Phase 1 of Application-Level monitoring.  Focus on monitoring of guest services such as up/down status, listening on specific ports, simple response/request validation.

Expected results:

Simple HTTP request to app status page that should return with a response 200 and valid text.

Simple database query that validates data is being properly returned and within a reasonable timeframe.

Comment 1 Michal Skrivanek 2014-04-14 09:55:44 UTC

on windows this is relatively straightforward, but on Linux - how it should look like? All services? Just a textual dump of something like "service --status-all"? or some specific services only….configurable list of them?
maybe set of customer-supplied scripts to monitor arbitrary services?

Comment 2 Scott Herold 2014-04-23 20:13:08 UTC

Post 3.5, there will be a feature page created for this particular feature where we can address both Windows and Linux.  We need to start with something easily consumable, and the scripting idea has come up several times in various places.

Comment 3 Itamar Heim 2014-04-25 06:56:30 UTC

i think we should use same approach of external monitoring for any type of guest by remote monitoring of the guest?
no need to re-invent the wheel - something like pacemaker with resource agents?
http://www.linux-ha.org/wiki/Resource_Agents

Comment 4 Michal Skrivanek 2014-05-26 09:56:01 UTC

why do we want to do something new when we already have the nagios plugin? How about just deploy it

Comment 5 Itamar Heim 2014-08-05 14:16:23 UTC

*** Bug 1039170 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 6 Doron Fediuck 2015-06-07 09:06:07 UTC

Closing old bugs. If this issue is still relevant/important in current version, please re-open the bug.