| Summary: | bogus error with -Werror=-Wformat-security ? | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Ralf Corsepius <rc040203> |
| Component: | gcc | Assignee: | Jakub Jelinek <jakub> |
| Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 19 | CC: | jakub, law |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2013-12-04 11:22:37 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
This is not a bug. The warning is emitted by the C/C++ frontends, so there are no optimizations (and at -O0 there wouldn't be any anyway) that would fold ptr1 into &text[0], ptr1 is not a string literal, it is a variable that in some other testcase could be changed to something completely different. |
Description of problem: Compile this code snippet with -Werror=-Wformat-security; #include <stdio.h> int main() { const char text[] = "hallo world\n"; const char *ptr1 = &text[0]; fprintf( stdout, ptr1); fprintf( stdout, &text[0] ); return 1; } gcc complains about the 1st fprintf, but doesn't complain about the 2nd one: # gcc -Wall -Werror=format-security -o foo.o -c foo.c foo.c: In function ‘main’: foo.c:8:3: error: format not a string literal and no format arguments [-Werror=format-security] fprintf( stdout, ptr1); ^ cc1: some warnings being treated as errors Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): gcc-4.8.2-1.fc19.x86_64 How reproducible: Always. Expected results: I would expect GCC to either warn on both use case or on none. The current situation seems bogus to me.