Bug 1037517

Summary: ocspd-2.5.1 is available
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Upstream Release Monitoring <upstream-release-monitoring>
Component: ocspdAssignee: Patrick Monnerat <patrick>
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: rawhideCC: b38617, patrick
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Enhancement
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2013-12-03 10:36:26 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:

Description Upstream Release Monitoring 2013-12-03 10:18:07 UTC
Latest upstream release: 2.5.1
Current version/release in Fedora Rawhide: 1.9.0-1.fc21
URL: http://ftp.openca.org/openca-ocspd/releases/v2.5.1/sources/

Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy

More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring

Comment 1 Patrick Monnerat 2013-12-03 10:36:26 UTC
Versions above 1.9.0 use libpki: I requested a review for the later (BZ 723575) and withdrawn it after 16 months of inactivity, mainly because this lib is much flawed (memory leaks everywhere).

I've then decided to take care myself of ocspd 1.9.0 maintenance and fixes based on BZ reports as long as I can. I'm afraid I did not find a reasonable alternative/replacement.

Comment 2 Account closed by the user 2013-12-03 12:43:21 UTC
(In reply to Patrick Monnerat from comment #1)

> Versions above 1.9.0 use libpki: I requested a review for the later (BZ
> 723575) and withdrawn it after 16 months of inactivity, mainly because this
> lib is much flawed (memory leaks everywhere).

Maybe, you should try it with a _recent_ libpki.

thank you.