Bug 1037900

Summary: Review Request: rubygem-resque-job-stats - Job-centric stats for Resque
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Ken Dreyer <ktdreyer>
Component: Package ReviewAssignee: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody>
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: rawhideCC: package-review, valtri
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-11-16 22:13:55 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 201449    

Description Ken Dreyer 2013-12-04 02:47:09 UTC
Spec URL: http://ktdreyer.fedorapeople.org/reviews/rubygem-resque-job-stats.spec
SRPM URL: http://ktdreyer.fedorapeople.org/reviews/rubygem-resque-job-stats-0.3.0-1.fc21.src.rpm
Description: Tracks jobs performed, failed, and the duration of the last 100 jobs for each job type.
Fedora Account System Username: ktdreyer

F21 scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6254316

Comment 3 František Dvořák 2014-07-17 11:55:04 UTC
Trying a review... (although unexperienced, I don't have any ruby package yet)


Found only cosmetics (nothing needs to be changed):

1) For downloading sources you can consider client that preserves the upstream timestamps:

  https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines?rd=PackagingGuidelines#Timestamps

2) Why is the '%exclude %{gem_instdir}/test' in -doc subpackage? But there is probably no reason why not.


Remarks:

* You're patching out development files in %prep. It is true it may be better than using %exclude in %files, right? (Files won't be installed, they won't be there during testing...).

* %check section: It looks like redis-server listens only on IPv4 and communication during testing goes through 127.0.0.1. But it works well in koji and even on IPv6-only machine.


Would you agree for review swap with rubygem-json_spec (#1079640)? But I can do formal review here anyway. :-)

Thank you,
  František

Comment 4 František Dvořák 2016-06-20 06:16:52 UTC
I know the formal process of review has not started, but I guess this review can be considered as stalled and closed.

But I can review, if you're interested in it. Over time there are some new issues to consider, for example:

* %license tag has been added into guidelines
* Fedora 20 conditional macros can be removed
* upstream searches for new maintainer