Bug 1038177

Summary: [fix available] ant-nodeps dropped from release, buildrequires need adjusted
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 Reporter: Bill Nottingham <notting>
Component: libfontsAssignee: Caolan McNamara <caolanm>
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX QA Contact: Desktop QE <desktop-qa-list>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 7.0CC: mizdebsk, riehecky, rvokal, sochotni, tis
Target Milestone: rc   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: 1037822 Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-12-06 15:37:37 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:

Description Bill Nottingham 2013-12-04 14:46:46 UTC 
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #1037822 +++

Description of problem:

ant-nodeps was removed during a cleanup, however, it appears to still be buildrequired:

  ant-nodeps in libbase.src
  ant-nodeps in libfonts.src  
  ant-nodeps in libformula.src
  ant-nodeps in libloader.src 
  ant-nodeps in librepository.src
  ant-nodeps in libserializer.src 
  ant-nodeps in pentaho-libxml.src
  ant-nodeps in tomcat.src

If we want to be able to rebuild any of those packages, we should either fix them, or bring ant-nodeps back.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

latest-releng tree

--- Additional comment from Stanislav Ochotnicky on 2013-12-04 04:40:32 EST ---

Subpackage ant-nodeps was removed (and provided/obsoleted) in January 2011 (commit 2751f9e). That provides/obsoletes was cleaned up later (April 2013, still in Fedora) since all packages were supposed to migrate.

This is a bug in respective packages and a simple s/ant-nodeps/ant/ should fix it.
Comment 3 Ludek Smid 2014-06-26 10:49:36 UTC 
This request was resolved in Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7.0.

Contact your manager or support representative in case you have further questions about the request.
Comment 4 Ludek Smid 2014-06-26 11:14:28 UTC 
The comment above is incorrect. The correct version is bellow.
I'm sorry for any inconvenience.
---------------------------------------------------------------

This request was NOT resolved in Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7.0.

Contact your manager or support representative in case you need
to escalate this bug.
Comment 5 Caolan McNamara 2016-12-06 15:37:26 UTC 
The fixes were checked in and the rpms built, just not included in the release. If there's ever a respin for any other reason this fix will be included automatically.
Comment 6 Red Hat Bugzilla Rules Engine 2016-12-06 15:37:37 UTC 
Development Management has reviewed and declined this request. You may appeal this decision by reopening this request.