Bug 1039288
| Summary: | GB in interface is 1000*1024*1024 bytes which is neither binary nor decimal | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Alexey Torkhov <atorkhov> |
| Component: | anaconda | Assignee: | Anaconda Maintenance Team <anaconda-maint-list> |
| Status: | CLOSED RAWHIDE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 20 | CC: | anaconda-maint-list, awilliam, bugzilla, dgunchev, g.kaviyarasu, jonathan, jreznik, mruckman, robatino, vanmeeuwen+fedora |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | RejectedBlocker RejectedFreezeException | ||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2014-01-16 19:38:51 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Alexey Torkhov
2013-12-07 17:46:23 UTC
Blocking according to: The installer must be able to create and install to any workable partition layout using any file system and/or container format combination offered in a default installer configuration. Explanation: as user I'm not understanding sizes installer shows and unable to create layout with exact size I need to. we really appreciate all the reports, but I think you might be setting a bit too low a bar on blocker nominations. a blocker on that criterion would be something like 'it explodes when i try and create an xfs partition', not 'the units are a bit off'... I agree it's a bug, the units should be either MB, GB or MiB, GiB not some blend. But -1 as a blocker, suggest reset to Rawhide. -1 blocker in case I won't be able to make the blocker meeting. Discussed in 2013-12-09 Blocker Review meeting [1]. Voted as a RejectedBlocker and RejectedFreezeException. If the report is accurate this obviously ought to be fixed, but doesn't have any consequences significant enough to violate any criteria. also rejected as FE as it's too late to change something like this which could break other things. [1] http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-blocker-review/2013-12-09/ |