Bug 1039748

Summary: ff ESR24.2 failed to initialize some shared libs
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 Reporter: Tomas Pelka <tpelka>
Component: firefoxAssignee: Martin Stransky <stransky>
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX QA Contact: Desktop QE <desktop-qa-list>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 5.10CC: stransky, tpelka
Target Milestone: rc   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2014-01-28 14:36:49 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:

Description Tomas Pelka 2013-12-09 21:56:04 UTC 
Description of problem:
LoadPlugin: failed to initialize shared library /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins/libtotem-mully-plugin.so [/usr/lib/xulrunner/libxpcom.so: undefined symbol: NS_InitXPCOM2_P]
LoadPlugin: failed to initialize shared library /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins/libtotem-basic-plugin.so [/usr/lib/xulrunner/libxpcom.so: undefined symbol: NS_InitXPCOM2_P]
LoadPlugin: failed to initialize shared library /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins/libtotem-complex-plugin.so [/usr/lib/xulrunner/libxpcom.so: undefined symbol: NS_InitXPCOM2_P]
LoadPlugin: failed to initialize shared library /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins/libtotem-gmp-plugin.so [/usr/lib/xulrunner/libxpcom.so: undefined symbol: NS_InitXPCOM2_P]
LoadPlugin: failed to initialize shared library /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins/libtotem-narrowspace-plugin.so [/usr/lib/xulrunner/libxpcom.so: undefined symbol: NS_InitXPCOM2_P]

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
firefox-24.2.0-1.el5_10

How reproducible:
100%

Steps to Reproduce:
1. start ff
2.
3.

Actual results:
see description

Expected results:
no such failures


Additional info:
ff seems to work normally
Comment 1 Martin Stransky 2013-12-10 15:05:43 UTC 
Which architecture is that?
Comment 2 Tomas Pelka 2013-12-10 15:16:50 UTC 
Not arch specific.
Comment 4 RHEL Program Management 2014-01-28 14:36:49 UTC 
Development Management has reviewed and declined this request.
You may appeal this decision by reopening this request.