Bug 1039875

Summary:	[DEV] Add missing constructors in AbstractBoottimeAddStepHandler
Product:	[JBoss] JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 6	Reporter:	Emmanuel Hugonnet (ehsavoie) <ehugonne>
Component:	Domain Management	Assignee:	Brian Stansberry <brian.stansberry>
Status:	CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE	QA Contact:	Petr Kremensky <pkremens>
Severity:	high	Docs Contact:	Russell Dickenson <rdickens>
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	6.2.0	CC:	brian.stansberry, cdewolf, emuckenh, misty, myarboro, nziakova, smumford
Target Milestone:	CR1
Target Release:	EAP 6.2.1
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:	New constructs were added upstream to the super class for org.jboss.as.controller.AbstractBoottimeAddStepHandler, however they were not added to the handler itself, meaning the class had differing constructs. These constructs have now been added as required.	Story Points:	---
Clone Of:	1039864	Environment:
Last Closed:	2014-02-24 20:16:01 UTC	Type:	Enhancement
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:	1039864
Bug Blocks:	1027004

Description Emmanuel Hugonnet (ehsavoie) 2013-12-10 08:51:00 UTC

+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #1039864 +++

org.jboss.as.controller.AbstractBoottimeAddStepHandler hasn't the same constructors as its super class.
These have been created in Wildfly (commit c75e36a9) but they are missing from EAP.

public AbstractBoottimeAddStepHandler() {
}

public AbstractBoottimeAddStepHandler(Collection<AttributeDefinition> attributes) {
    super(attributes);
}

public AbstractBoottimeAddStepHandler(AttributeDefinition... attributes) {
    super(attributes);
}


They are required for the EAP 5 retro-compatibility extension.

Comment 1 Emmanuel Hugonnet (ehsavoie) 2013-12-10 08:55:23 UTC

This is a clone of Bug #1039864 for 6.2.1

Comment 6 Scott Mumford 2014-01-21 03:34:27 UTC

Marking for inclusion in 6.2.1 release notes as this bug is listed in the master tracking BZ 1027004.

Comment 7 Scott Mumford 2014-01-22 01:02:02 UTC

Added draft release note based on the limited information in this ticket.

Comment 8 Brian Stansberry 2014-01-22 02:09:31 UTC

I don't believe this should be included in the release notes. It was a change to an internal class made to allow other work to proceed.

If you want to include it, the proposed text is fine.

Comment 9 Scott Mumford 2014-01-22 04:29:40 UTC

Thanks for the update Brian.

I'll take it out of the Release Notes.

Comment 11 Nikoleta Hlavickova 2014-01-23 13:33:01 UTC

Verified with 6.2.1.CP.CR1-patch.