| Summary: | Fail to access mirror1.ops.rhcloud.com | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | OpenShift Online | Reporter: | Lei Zhang <lzhang> |
| Component: | Image | Assignee: | Ben Parees <bparees> |
| Status: | CLOSED CANTFIX | QA Contact: | libra bugs <libra-bugs> |
| Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | 2.x | CC: | tdawson, xtian |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2014-01-24 22:11:22 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
|
Description
Lei Zhang
2013-12-10 11:59:25 UTC
mirror1.ops and mirror2.ops were updated yesterday to RHEL 6.5. Although mirror2.ops updated correctly and worked properly, mirror1.ops worked for a while and then had issues with httpd staying alive. It has now been fixed, but we are still investigating the issue. As for having more than one machine listed (having mirror2.ops would have worked) I agree with you. I do not have the java/xml skills necessary for that. Because the servers have been fixed, I am changing the severity from high to medium. This bug is no longer blocking. I am switching this over to the cartridge component because the cartridge should be able to fail over from mirror1 to mirror2 to prevent this from happening in the future. Based on my research there actually is no way to specify more than one url for a given mirror, or more than one mirror for a given repository. http://maven.apache.org/guides/mini/guide-mirror-settings.html "Note that there can be at most one mirror for a given repository. In other words, you cannot map a single repository to a group of mirrors that all define the same <mirrorOf> value." It's a strange limitation, but it seems like it would take a maven change to fix. |