| Summary: | [RFE][horizon]: Modals and supporting different screen sizes | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat OpenStack | Reporter: | RHOS Integration <rhos-integ> |
| Component: | python-django-horizon | Assignee: | RHOS Maint <rhos-maint> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Ido Ovadia <iovadia> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | unspecified | CC: | aberezin, aortega, dnavale, iovadia, jpichon, markmc, mrunge, yeylon |
| Target Milestone: | Upstream M3 | Keywords: | FutureFeature, Triaged |
| Target Release: | 5.0 (RHEL 7) | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| URL: | https://blueprints.launchpad.net/horizon/+spec/modals-and-supporting-different-screen-sizes | ||
| Whiteboard: | upstream_milestone_icehouse-3 upstream_status_implemented upstream_definition_approved | ||
| Fixed In Version: | python-django-horizon-2014.1-5.el7ost | Doc Type: | Enhancement |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2014-07-08 15:40:00 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
|
Description
RHOS Integration
2013-12-12 20:57:36 UTC
from this blueprint, only the fullscreen attribute to modals was implemented. This feature could internally be used in horizon, but can not be tested, as dependent (and user visible changes) are not merged. (In reply to Matthias Runge from comment #3) > from this blueprint, only the fullscreen attribute to modals was implemented. > > This feature could internally be used in horizon, but can not be tested, as > dependent (and user visible changes) are not merged. According to comment #3 my suggestion is: 1. Change the target release/milestone. Or, 2. Provide an info what and how can it tested now, and open new RFE for the rest of feature abilities . 3. don't test. We had many blueprints during this cycle providing infrastructure for new features. I would recommend, not to test this. Due to the fact, we're matching blueprints to bugzilla bugs, and we can't handle semi-implemented blueprints, we have very limited options here. Since it is not fully implemented, it is back to assigned. Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2014-0855.html |