| Summary: | Cannot resize LVs already scheduled for reformat | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 | Reporter: | Adam Williamson <awilliam> |
| Component: | anaconda | Assignee: | David Lehman <dlehman> |
| Status: | CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Release Test Team <release-test-team> |
| Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | low | ||
| Version: | 7.0 | CC: | anaconda-maint-list, awilliam, borgan |
| Target Milestone: | rc | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | All | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | 1040445 | Environment: | |
| Last Closed: | 2014-07-17 18:57:02 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
|
Description
Adam Williamson
2013-12-13 07:53:53 UTC
This is more or less the same in RHEL 7 public beta, except that once you set a mount point and check 'Reformat', the 'Desired Capacity' box is greyed out - in F20, it's not greyed out, but changes to it don't take effect. RHEL 7 behaviour is kinda better, really, because at least it's not confusing, but it seems like there's no actual reason why resize should be disabled once a mount point and 'reformat' are set, so it still seems worth filing. But setting severity to 'low'. Please include anaconda version numbers so I don't have to go looking around in the compose trees to figure out the anaconda version. Is this a duplicate of bug 1029633? From the description I'd guess it likely is, but that bug says "Please see the video." but I don't see an attached video. It sounds very similar from the description, though. Can you try it again with RHEL-7.0-20140210.0 or later and see if it's fixed? I'll do my best. Looks good with 0226. Actually it's OK with 0127 too (but it's definitely still broken with the public beta, I went back and checked that just to make sure I hadn't simply forgotten how to reproduce it or something). |