| Summary: | [RFE] Storage domain gets activated even if one of the host can't access it | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization Manager | Reporter: | Pratik Pravin Bandarkar <pbandark> |
| Component: | ovirt-engine | Assignee: | Nobody <nobody> |
| Status: | CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Raz Tamir <ratamir> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 3.2.0 | CC: | dmoessne, klaas, lpeer, mlipchuk, psahoo, rbalakri, Rhev-m-bugs, scohen, srevivo, tnisan, ylavi |
| Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | FutureFeature, Improvement |
| Target Release: | --- | Flags: | sherold:
Triaged+
|
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Enhancement | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2018-06-04 08:31:49 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | Storage | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
|
Description
Pratik Pravin Bandarkar
2013-12-13 20:25:00 UTC
Allon, how do you want to handle it? possibly we can make it to be a 3.5 RFE, basically same issue as "prepare for maintenace" (here it will be "prepare for activation or something like that) if we do want to proceed with it. (In reply to Liron Aravot from comment #4) > Allon, how do you want to handle it? possibly we can make it to be a 3.5 > RFE, basically same issue as "prepare for maintenace" (here it will be > "prepare for activation or something like that) if we do want to proceed > with it. We need to see how this fits in our 3.5 capacity, but definitely an RFE that should be tackled. could this bring down many hypervisors or even whole clusters if they can't access the storage domain? I only had the problem with one hypervisor like the the original reporter. This is fixed in 4.1, can be closed BZ<2>Jira Resync |