| Summary: | epoch revision for f20 is lowewr than f19 and causes issues with fedup | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Robert Lightfoot <BobLfoot> |
| Component: | sane-backends | Assignee: | Nils Philippsen <nphilipp> |
| Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 20 | CC: | nphilipp |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2013-12-16 14:17:59 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
|
Description
Robert Lightfoot
2013-12-14 08:55:59 UTC
I've recently pushed updates (sane-backends-1.0.24-7) for all Fedora releases (18 to 20) in sync. It can be (due to freezes in the ramp-up of F-20) that a particular update reaches stable in F-19 sooner than in F-20, but this is not something a package maintainer has influence over, nor should this hold back updates in older Fedora releases (and -7 has been pushed to stable this weekend). Besides that, the F-19 package should be perfectly functional on F-20, the only difference is the location of the package documentation: F-20 doesn't append the version number for the documentation directory name any more. |