Bug 1043981

Summary: [abrt] fedup: fedup-cli:216:main:AttributeError: 'ProblemSummary' object has no attribute 'format_details'
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Vladimir Krcho <vlkovo>
Component: fedupAssignee: Will Woods <wwoods>
Status: CLOSED EOL QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 20CC: bugreporter1, djuran, jeff, jon.dufresne, m.a.young, sgrubb, tflink, wwoods
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: x86_64   
OS: Unspecified   
URL: https://retrace.fedoraproject.org/faf/reports/bthash/042a217726e325282714edf28971d4d168a1218c
Whiteboard: abrt_hash:a05d11ca13f327068dcee22d0850683b0b06a542
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2015-06-30 01:33:52 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
File: backtrace
none
File: environ
none
Here is fedup.log none

Description Vladimir Krcho 2013-12-17 14:43:21 UTC
Description of problem:
sudo fedup-cli --network 20

Version-Release number of selected component:
fedup-0.8.0-3.fc19

Additional info:
reporter:       libreport-2.1.10
cmdline:        /usr/bin/python /bin/fedup-cli --network 20 --debuglog /mnt/d/fedupdebug2.log
executable:     /bin/fedup-cli
kernel:         3.11.10-200.fc19.x86_64
runlevel:       N 5
type:           Python
uid:            0

Truncated backtrace:
#1 main in /bin/fedup-cli:216
#2 <module> in /bin/fedup-cli:236

Comment 1 Vladimir Krcho 2013-12-17 14:43:30 UTC
Created attachment 837708 [details]
File: backtrace

Comment 2 Vladimir Krcho 2013-12-17 14:43:32 UTC
Created attachment 837709 [details]
File: environ

Comment 3 Will Woods 2013-12-17 21:31:58 UTC
I believe the *traceback* would be fixed by this commit:

  https://github.com/wgwoods/fedup/commit/01e0419

But the traceback happened while fedup was trying to report an error.

The original error seems to be a problem with the RPM transaction, which might resolve itself once the affected package(s) are updated.

Comment 4 Michael Young 2013-12-19 12:35:27 UTC
(In reply to Will Woods from comment #3)
> I believe the *traceback* would be fixed by this commit:
> 
>   https://github.com/wgwoods/fedup/commit/01e0419
> 
> But the traceback happened while fedup was trying to report an error.
> 
> The original error seems to be a problem with the RPM transaction, which
> might resolve itself once the affected package(s) are updated.

I applied that patch manually to the upgrade.py file and fedup (from F19 to F20 using --iso) now starts upgrading following the reboot (the conflict in my case turned out to be avahi.x86_64 with avahi-libs.i686 which I should be able to fix afterwards).

Comment 5 Steve Grubb 2014-01-19 16:07:57 UTC
So, is this fix going to be pushed out to F19? I also have an upgrade that crashes setting up the upgrade. I have no idea if its safe to reboot into the upgrade or how to rollback anything that was prepared. IOW, it would be great if a fix was pushed out.

Comment 6 Will Woods 2014-01-20 19:44:39 UTC
It's being worked on. Got 56 other new bug reports to sort through first.

Can you attach your fedup.log so I can try to figure out the actual cause of the RPM transaction problem?

Comment 7 Vladimir Krcho 2014-01-21 08:07:17 UTC
Created attachment 853003 [details]
Here is fedup.log

After unsuccesfull upgrade by fedup i upgraded to f20 by yum.

Comment 8 Steve Grubb 2014-01-21 16:40:11 UTC
I don't have the logs. I had a small window of time to upgrade the system and decided to go with yum distro-sync. I have another couple of systems to upgrade and if I run into a problem, I will get the logs. But if you have a large number of bugs, maybe a couple updates is in order? Thanks.

Comment 9 Will Woods 2014-01-21 18:26:46 UTC
I have a large number of bug *reports*. The actual number of bugs is small, but bug triage takes time. If you want to get fixes faster, help with bug triage.

Comment 10 Will Woods 2014-01-23 19:05:46 UTC
*** Bug 1044517 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 11 Will Woods 2014-03-21 17:39:05 UTC
*** Bug 1079370 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 12 Will Woods 2014-03-21 17:39:10 UTC
*** Bug 1079369 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 13 Fedora Update System 2014-06-04 16:47:37 UTC
fedup-0.8.1-1.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/fedup-0.8.1-1.fc19

Comment 14 Fedora Update System 2014-06-04 16:49:03 UTC
fedup-0.8.1-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/fedup-0.8.1-1.fc20

Comment 15 Fedora Update System 2014-06-05 04:23:40 UTC
Package fedup-0.8.1-1.fc19:
* should fix your issue,
* was pushed to the Fedora 19 testing repository,
* should be available at your local mirror within two days.
Update it with:
# su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing fedup-0.8.1-1.fc19'
as soon as you are able to.
Please go to the following url:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-7085/fedup-0.8.1-1.fc19
then log in and leave karma (feedback).

Comment 16 Fedora Update System 2014-08-15 02:43:38 UTC
fedup-0.8.1-1.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

Comment 17 Jeff Klein 2014-10-22 00:46:58 UTC
I am trying to upgrade from Fedora Core 18 -> FC20 via the following fedup command:

sudo fedup --network 20

and am getting the same error as described in this bug report. If I understood correctly, it is fixed in FC19 and FC20. Will the fix be back-ported to FC18?

Thanks and regards,
Jeff Klein

Comment 18 Fedora Update System 2014-10-29 21:12:49 UTC
fedup-0.9.0-1.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/fedup-0.9.0-1.fc19

Comment 19 Fedora Update System 2014-11-03 18:05:40 UTC
fedup-0.9.0-2.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/fedup-0.9.0-2.fc19

Comment 20 Fedora Update System 2014-11-05 03:57:35 UTC
fedup-0.9.0-2.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

Comment 21 Fedora End Of Life 2015-05-29 10:01:02 UTC
This message is a reminder that Fedora 20 is nearing its end of life.
Approximately 4 (four) weeks from now Fedora will stop maintaining
and issuing updates for Fedora 20. It is Fedora's policy to close all
bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time
this bug will be closed as EOL if it remains open with a Fedora  'version'
of '20'.

Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you
plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' 
to a later Fedora version.

Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we were not 
able to fix it before Fedora 20 is end of life. If you would still like 
to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version 
of Fedora, you are encouraged  change the 'version' to a later Fedora 
version prior this bug is closed as described in the policy above.

Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's 
lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a 
more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes 
bugs or makes them obsolete.

Comment 22 Fedora End Of Life 2015-06-30 01:33:52 UTC
Fedora 20 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2015-06-23. Fedora 20 is
no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further
security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug.

If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of
Fedora please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. If you
are unable to reopen this bug, please file a new report against the
current release. If you experience problems, please add a comment to this
bug.

Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed.