Bug 1044341
| Summary: | [virtio-win][vioser]Transfer data failed in win8-32 guest after re-hotplug virtio-serial and serial port. | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 | Reporter: | Min Deng <mdeng> |
| Component: | virtio-win | Assignee: | Gal Hammer <ghammer> |
| Status: | CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Virtualization Bugs <virt-bugs> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | 7.0 | CC: | ailan, amit.shah, ghammer, jen, juzhang, knoel, lijin, mdeng, michen, rbalakri, rpacheco, virt-bugs, virt-maint, wyu |
| Target Milestone: | rc | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | virtio-win-prewhql-0.1-122 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2017-01-06 06:55:41 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 1288337 | ||
|
Description
Min Deng
2013-12-18 06:52:27 UTC
Please explain what does it mean when you write "ports didn't work"? 1. Is it exist in the qtree? 2. Is the port exists inside the Window guest? 3. Data it not received from the host? (bz#1027181)? (In reply to Gal Hammer from comment #1) > Please explain what does it mean when you write "ports didn't work"? > > 1. Is it exist in the qtree? > 2. Is the port exists inside the Window guest? > 3. Data it not received from the host? (bz#1027181)? For 3,the data could not transfer any longer via those ports. (In reply to dengmin from comment #2) > (In reply to Gal Hammer from comment #1) > > Please explain what does it mean when you write "ports didn't work"? > > > > 1. Is it exist in the qtree? > > 2. Is the port exists inside the Window guest? > > 3. Data it not received from the host? (bz#1027181)? > For 3,the data could not transfer any longer via those ports. Both guest-to-host and host-to-guest? (In reply to Gal Hammer from comment #3) > (In reply to dengmin from comment #2) > > (In reply to Gal Hammer from comment #1) > > > Please explain what does it mean when you write "ports didn't work"? > > > > > > 1. Is it exist in the qtree? > > > 2. Is the port exists inside the Window guest? > > > 3. Data it not received from the host? (bz#1027181)? > > For 3,the data could not transfer any longer via those ports. > > Both guest-to-host and host-to-guest? For 1,it existed in qtree after re-hotplug. For 2,yes,the ports were found inside guest. Both guest-to-host and host-to-guest cannot work.it still didn't work even if rebooting guest. Moved to RHEL-7 based on versions given in comment #0. win2k8r2 hit the same issue when run transfer scripts as following,ports don't work after re-hotplug: for ((i=1;i<=1000;i++)); do python serial-host-receive.py /tmp/helloworld1; done But both ports work well if I add "sleep 1" in the transfer scripts as: for ((i=1;i<=1000;i++)); do python serial-host-receive.py /tmp/helloworld2; sleep 1; done I'm unable to reproduce with build 122, windows 8.1 and qemu 2.6. Can you please re-test it and see if you can reproduce it with current/updated components versions? Thanks. Hi damchen, Could you please help to handle comment#21? (In reply to lijin from comment #22) > Hi damchen, > > Could you please help to handle comment#21? I have re-test it. The problem is not to reproduce with build 122, windows 8.1 and qemu 2.6. (In reply to damchen from comment #23) > > (In reply to lijin from comment #22) > > Hi damchen, > > > > Could you please help to handle comment#21? > > I have re-test it. The problem is not to reproduce with build 122, windows > 8.1 and qemu 2.6. Thanks for the confirmation. Re-test with build 126 on win8-32, steps as comment#0, cannot reproduce it. So this bug has been fixed. Change status to verfied Thanks Yu Wang close as this issue has already been fixed in rhel7.3 virtio-win package |