Bug 1044583

Summary: [Doc] ICG Documentation Links are Broken
Product: Red Hat OpenStack Reporter: Stephen Benjamin <stbenjam>
Component: doc-Installation_and_Configuration_GuideAssignee: Scott Radvan <sradvan>
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE QA Contact: ecs-bugs
Severity: urgent Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: unspecifiedCC: breeler, rlandman, sradvan, stbenjam, yeylon
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: Documentation, Triaged
Target Release: 5.0 (RHEL 7)   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2014-02-09 23:36:02 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:

Description Stephen Benjamin 2013-12-18 15:36:11 UTC
Description of problem:
When searching Google for openstack information, and a Red Hat link comes up in the search results, it 404's.

How reproducible:
Always


Steps to Reproduce:
1. Search for "site:access.redhat.com openstack custom image"

Actual results:
1. 404

Expected results:
2. Get the documentation

Additional info:
I can't give you the direct link because Google obfuscates it, and we redirect instantly away from it.

Comment 2 Stephen Benjamin 2013-12-18 16:07:27 UTC
Here's an example of a broken link:
https://access.redhat.com/site/documentation/resources/docs/en-US/Red_Hat_OpenStack/3/html/Installation_and_Configuration_Guide/Building_a_Custom_Disk_Image.html

This actual documentation shows up twice in Google results (one correct, one incorrect).  We should probably never, ever make documentation links invalid... and 301 redirect so Google knows to do the right thing...

http://www.google.com/custom?q=site%3Aaccess.redhat.com+custom+openstack+disk+image&btnG=Search

Comment 7 Ruediger Landmann 2014-02-09 23:36:02 UTC
The link in comment 2 and those like it will be fixed when we get the redirect mechanism working. This isn't a true dupe of #1058817, but fixing that will fix this too.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1058817 ***