| Summary: | mount option "backupvolfile-server" causes mount to fail with "Invalid argument" | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 | Reporter: | Vivek Agarwal <vagarwal> |
| Component: | glusterfs | Assignee: | Bug Updates Notification Mailing List <rhs-bugs> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | SATHEESARAN <sasundar> |
| Severity: | urgent | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | urgent | ||
| Version: | 6.5 | CC: | aavati, csaba, dron, eharney, fharshav, gfidente, grajaiya, iheim, jsvarova, rbalakri, rcyriac, sankarshan, sdharane, shaines, sputhenp, vagarwal, vbellur, yeylon |
| Target Milestone: | rc | Keywords: | ZStream |
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | glusterfs-3.4.0.57rhs | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
| Doc Text: |
When trying to mount a remote gluster share using the "backupvolfile-server" option, the process failed and returned an "Invalid argument" error message. A new mount point option, backup-volfile-servers, has been added to provide backward compatibility and allows remote gluster shares to be mounted successfully.
|
Story Points: | --- |
| Clone Of: | 1023950 | Environment: | |
| Last Closed: | 2014-10-14 08:07:02 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Bug Depends On: | 1023950, 1044799 | ||
| Bug Blocks: | 1039643, 1052381 | ||
|
Comment 1
Vivek Agarwal
2014-01-13 17:32:58 UTC
Verified with the glusterfs native client - glusterfs-3.6.0.29-2.el6 'backupvolfile-server' option is available with this native client, and thus enabling backward compatibility. Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2014-1576.html |