Bug 104490

Summary: CAN-2003-0693/5 OpenSSH buffer allocation bug
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 2.1 Reporter: Mark J. Cox <mjc>
Component: opensshAssignee: Nalin Dahyabhai <nalin>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Brian Brock <bbrock>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: high    
Version: 2.1Keywords: Security
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2003-09-17 19:58:32 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Mark J. Cox 2003-09-16 12:09:46 UTC
A bug has been found in the buffer code in OpenSSH.  It is not yet clear if this
could be exploited by an attacker but several possible attack vectors are under
evaluation.  A patch from the OpenBSD team is available.

RHSA-2003:280 in progress.

Comment 1 Mark J. Cox 2003-09-16 17:51:34 UTC
An errata has been issued which should help the problem described in this bug report. 
This report is therefore being closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on the solution and/or where to find the updated files, please follow the link below. You may reopen 
this bug report if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2003-280.html


Comment 2 Mark J. Cox 2003-09-17 08:02:26 UTC
Reopening bug due to additional issues found in OpenSSH.

I've allocated CAN-2003-0695 to these additional fixes and we're working on
updating our package sets.

Comment 3 Mark J. Cox 2003-09-17 19:58:32 UTC
An errata has been issued which should help the problem described in this bug report. 
This report is therefore being closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on the solution and/or where to find the updated files, please follow the link below. You may reopen 
this bug report if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2003-280.html