| Summary: | Upstream: bluez5 branch of bluedevil is NOT ready for consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Mace Moneta <moneta.mace> |
| Component: | bluedevil | Assignee: | Jaroslav Reznik <jreznik> |
| Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 20 | CC: | jgrulich, jreznik, kevin, ltinkl, rdieter, than |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2013-12-20 15:54:22 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
|
Description
Mace Moneta
2013-12-19 23:28:20 UTC
Backing this out now is impossible. When our Bluetooth maintainers asked upstream about BlueZ 5 support, he claimed that it'd be ready by the time Fedora 20 releases. Now, Fedora 20 has actually slipped by a few days, so it's even later than when we originally planned to release. Now that Fedora 20 has been released, it is way too late to downgrade the whole BlueZ stack (which affects all desktops, not just KDE). Such decisions have to be made well in advance of the release, and the story upstream told us back then was very different from what he's saying now. Indeed, we're collaborating with upstream to resolve issues as soon as possible. In the meantime, I'd encourage you to try some newer builds: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/bluedevil |