Bug 104525
Summary: | LTC4036-Large number of threads locks up the system | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 3 | Reporter: | IBM Bug Proxy <bugproxy> |
Component: | kernel | Assignee: | Arjan van de Ven <arjanv> |
Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | Brian Brock <bbrock> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | 3.0 | ||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | i386 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2003-10-02 00:42:22 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
IBM Bug Proxy
2003-09-16 18:35:28 UTC
not that it's right for the kernel to hang, but the minimum amount of ram supported by RHEL3 is 256Mb ------ Additional Comments From kenbo.com 2003-16-09 15:15 ------- Well, if RHEL does not support running with less than 256MB of RAM, and we cannot duplicate otherwise, then should I upgrade my system and we call this not a bug? I guess it is up to RH and what they think about it and whether or not they want to pursue the issue. Any thoughts? What do y'all think? Thanks! kenbo well I'm not jumping from joy about hanging even with 128Mb, however: * increasing the thread value is a bit risky; the default is a value the kernel considers safe for this amount of ram * it's pretty low amount So while I rather not have a hang, it's not a super critical bug that warrants redesigning the VM at this stage. Changing state to closed/wontfix as the minimum supported memory configuration is 256M. |