Bug 1046623
| Summary: | Please enable TCP Lookup Table support in Postfix RPM by default | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 | Reporter: | Michal Bruncko <michal.bruncko> | ||||||
| Component: | postfix | Assignee: | Jaroslav Škarvada <jskarvad> | ||||||
| Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | qe-baseos-daemons | ||||||
| Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | |||||||
| Priority: | unspecified | ||||||||
| Version: | 6.6 | CC: | akarande, anderson.gomes, eric.wolfe, psklenar, sashaikh | ||||||
| Target Milestone: | rc | ||||||||
| Target Release: | --- | ||||||||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||||||||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||||||||
| Whiteboard: | |||||||||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |||||||
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||||
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||||
| Last Closed: | 2016-07-27 22:23:25 UTC | Type: | Bug | ||||||
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||||
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||||
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||||
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||||
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||||
| Embargoed: | |||||||||
| Bug Depends On: | |||||||||
| Bug Blocks: | 1002711, 1075802, 1172231, 1269194 | ||||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||||
|
Description
Michal Bruncko
2013-12-26 11:08:23 UTC
Created attachment 841894 [details]
patch which enables tcp_tables support in postfix
this is simple patch against postfix.spec which enables tcp lookup tables (tcp_tables) support in current version of postfix.
Created attachment 846769 [details]
Proposed patch
Compiling with -DSNAPSHOT is not good approach, because it enables more snapshot features. The attached patch should enable only the dict_tcp feature.
Thank you Jaro for this correction. Is there a chance to include this patch in RHEL6's postfix? thank you (In reply to Michal Bruncko from comment #4) > Thank you Jaro for this correction. Is there a chance to include this patch > in RHEL6's postfix? > thank you I am afraid there is a little chance. I acked it from the dev perspective, but it depends on the PM. If it is important for you or your business, please escalate this through the support channel: http://redhat.com/support (In reply to Jaroslav Škarvada from comment #5) > (In reply to Michal Bruncko from comment #4) > > Thank you Jaro for this correction. Is there a chance to include this patch > > in RHEL6's postfix? > > thank you > > I am afraid there is a little chance. I acked it from the dev perspective, > but it depends on the PM. > > If it is important for you or your business, please escalate this through > the support channel: > http://redhat.com/support Our organization is also interested in turning on TCP tables for the same use case. From my research into an SRS solution for the problem we are experiencing, the postsrsd project appears to be one of the only actively maintained SRS solutions for Postfix. I am not sure what you mean by depends on the PM? Project Manager? I suppose we will have to take up the issue of turning on a feature flag with support, then. (In reply to Eric Wolfe from comment #6) > I am not sure what you mean by depends on the PM? Project Manager? > Product Management > I suppose we will have to take up the issue of turning on a feature flag > with support, then. Yes, please escalate this issue through the support channel (you can link them this BZ). It's the way how to ensure this patch will gets in (in reasonable time). Red Hat Enterprise Linux version 6 is entering the Production 2 phase of its lifetime and this bug doesn't meet the criteria for it, i.e. only high severity issues will be fixed. Please see https://access.redhat.com/support/policy/updates/errata/ for further information. |