Bug 1046726
| Summary: | Rename Request: pluma - Text editor for the MATE desktop | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Wolfgang Ulbrich <raveit65.sun> |
| Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Dan Mashal <dan.mashal> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | dan.mashal, package-review, raveit65.sun |
| Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | Reopened |
| Target Release: | --- | Flags: | dan.mashal:
fedora-review+
kevin: fedora-cvs+ |
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2014-09-28 20:00:04 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 1086149 | ||
|
Description
Wolfgang Ulbrich
2013-12-26 19:15:48 UTC
This is a re-review request for a package rename. Old packackage name is mate-image-viewer. Note, this affect only rawhide, f18/19/20 will use mate-image-viewer-1.6.x until there EOL. (In reply to Wolfgang Ulbrich from comment #1) > This is a re-review request for a package rename. > Old packackage name is mate-image-viewer. > Note, this affect only rawhide, f18/19/20 will use mate-image-viewer-1.6.x > until there EOL. Sorry wrong, This is a re-review request for a package rename. Old packackage name is mate-text-editor. Note, this affect only rawhide, f18/19/20 will use mate-text-editor-1.6.x until there EOL. Hi Christopher, Why did you change the topic? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Renaming_Process says "normal review process" Is it a fatal error? Of course not. In fact changing that topic can indicates pretty clear: "This is just a package rename, be sure to check obsoletes/provides then give + is enough". I'm not familar with inside bugzilla processes, so i can't answer you question. But i prefer to follow guide lines to avoid stupid issues. I don't like unnecessary surprises if i do the scm request. For some clarification, the "Rename Request" prefix is not mandatory. It has been in use for several years by some packagers to be more explicit about the request being for a package rename. I'm not aware of a Wiki page that mentions the prefix. However, the fedora-create-review tool also uses the prefix when using option --rename-request. Thanks Michael, for clarification. I'm happy to learn new things. Pluma is updated to 1.7.1 release Spec URL: http://raveit65.fedorapeople.org/Mate/SPECS/pluma.spec SRPM URL: http://raveit65.fedorapeople.org/Mate/SRPM/pluma-1.7.1-1.fc21.src.rpm Taking per Wolfgang's request. NOTES: 1) Please create noarch data subpackage. 2) Please update license to GPLv2+ and LGPLv2+ Successful Koji build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6524447 RPM installs and package runs as expected: http://i.imgur.com/PCEmeti.png ==================================================================== This is a review *template*. Besides handling the [ ]-marked tests you are also supposed to fix the template before pasting into bugzilla: - Add issues you find to the list of issues on top. If there isn't such a list, create one. - Add your own remarks to the template checks. - Add new lines marked [!] or [?] when you discover new things not listed by fedora-review. - Change or remove any text in the template which is plain wrong. In this case you could also file a bug against fedora-review - Remove the "[ ] Manual check required", you will not have any such lines in what you paste. - Remove attachments which you deem not really useful (the rpmlint ones are mandatory, though) - Remove this text Package Review ============== Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed ===== MUST items ===== C/C++: [ ]: Package does not contain kernel modules. [ ]: Package contains no static executables. [ ]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. Note: Unversioned so-files in private %_libdir subdirectory (see attachment). Verify they are not in ld path. [x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la) [x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs. Generic: [ ]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [ ]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "*No copyright* GPL (v2 or later)", "GPL (v2 or later)", "LGPL (v2 or later)", "Unknown or generated". 23 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/dan/fedora- review/1046726-pluma/licensecheck.txt [ ]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. [ ]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. Note: No known owner of /usr/share/locale/cmn, /usr/share/help/ar, /usr/share/help/da, /usr/share/locale/cmn/LC_MESSAGES, /usr/share/help/th [ ]: Package must own all directories that it creates. Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/share/help/fi, /usr/share/help/uk, /usr/share/help/de, /usr/share/help/da, /usr/share/help/sv, /usr/share/help/hu, /usr/share/help/fr, /usr/share/help/C, /usr/share/help/zh_HK, /usr/share/help/ja, /usr/share/help/es, /usr/share/help/cs, /usr/share/help, /usr/share/help/ar, /usr/share/help/ca, /usr/share/locale/cmn/LC_MESSAGES, /usr/share/help/el, /usr/share/help/zh_CN, /usr/share/help/pt_BR, /usr/share/help/oc, /usr/share/help/it, /usr/share/help/th, /usr/share/help/zh_TW, /usr/share/locale/cmn, /usr/share/gtk-doc/html, /usr/share/gtk-doc, /usr/share/help/ko, /usr/share/help/bg, /usr/share/help/ru [ ]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. Note: Dirs in package are owned also by: /usr/share/help/hu/pluma(mate- text-editor), /usr/share/help/es/pluma/figures(mate-text-editor), /usr/share/pluma/icons(mate-text-editor), /usr/share/help/zh_TW/pluma/figures(mate-text-editor), /usr/share/help/sv/pluma/figures(mate-text-editor), /usr/share/help/el/pluma/figures(mate-text-editor), /usr/share/pluma/plugins/sort(mate-text-editor), /usr/share/pluma/plugins/filebrowser(mate-text-editor), /usr/share/pluma/plugins/time(mate-text-editor), /usr/share/pluma/plugins/pythonconsole(mate-text-editor), /usr/share/help/C/pluma/figures(mate-text-editor), /usr/share/help/zh_HK/pluma/figures(mate-text-editor), /usr/share/help/C/pluma(mate-text-editor), /usr/share/pluma/ui(mate-text- editor), /usr/share/pluma/plugins/externaltools(mate-text-editor), /usr/share/help/ja/pluma(mate-text-editor), /usr/lib64/pluma/plugins/quickopen(mate-text-editor), /usr/share/help/zh_TW/pluma(mate-text-editor), /usr/share/pluma/plugins/spell(mate-text-editor), /usr/share/pluma/plugins/modelines(mate-text-editor), /usr/share/help/oc/pluma/figures(mate-text-editor), /usr/share/help/ja/pluma/figures(mate-text-editor), /usr/share/pluma/plugins/taglist(mate-text-editor), /usr/lib64/pluma/plugins/externaltools(mate-text-editor), /usr/share/help/fr/pluma(mate-text-editor), /usr/share/gtk-doc/html/pluma (mate-text-editor), /usr/lib64/pluma(mate-text-editor), /usr/share/help/es/pluma(mate-text-editor), /usr/share/help/fi/pluma/figures(mate-text-editor), /usr/share/help/ko/pluma(mate-text-editor), /usr/share/help/el/pluma (mate-text-editor), /usr/share/help/ca/pluma(mate-text-editor), /usr/share/help/bg/pluma(mate-text-editor), /usr/share/help/hu/pluma/figures(mate-text-editor), /usr/share/help/sv/pluma(mate-text-editor), /usr/lib64/pluma/plugins (mate-text-editor), /usr/share/help/cs/pluma/figures(mate-text-editor), /usr/include/pluma(mate-text-editor-devel), /usr/share/help/ar/pluma/figures(mate-text-editor), /usr/share/help/it/pluma/figures(mate-text-editor), /usr/share/help/fr/pluma/figures(mate-text-editor), /usr/share/pluma/plugins/pythonconsole/ui(mate-text-editor), /usr/share/pluma/plugins/externaltools/tools(mate-text-editor), /usr/share/help/cs/pluma(mate-text-editor), /usr/share/help/ru/pluma/figures(mate-text-editor), /usr/share/help/pt_BR/pluma(mate-text-editor), /usr/share/help/ko/pluma/figures(mate-text-editor), /usr/share/pluma/plugins/snippets/lang(mate-text-editor), /usr/share/help/bg/pluma/figures(mate-text-editor), /usr/share/pluma/plugins/snippets/ui(mate-text-editor), /usr/share/help/ru/pluma(mate-text-editor), /usr/share/pluma/plugins (mate-text-editor), /usr/share/help/da/pluma(mate-text-editor), /usr/share/help/th/pluma(mate-text-editor), /usr/share/help/oc/pluma (mate-text-editor), /usr/share/help/th/pluma/figures(mate-text-editor), /usr/share/pluma/plugins/docinfo(mate-text-editor), /usr/share/help/uk/pluma(mate-text-editor), /usr/share/help/zh_HK/pluma (mate-text-editor), /usr/lib64/pluma/plugin-loaders(mate-text-editor), /usr/share/pluma/plugins/externaltools/ui(mate-text-editor), /usr/share/pluma(mate-text-editor), /usr/share/help/da/pluma/figures (mate-text-editor), /usr/lib64/pluma/plugins/pythonconsole(mate-text- editor), /usr/share/help/zh_CN/pluma(mate-text-editor), /usr/share/help/zh_CN/pluma/figures(mate-text-editor), /usr/share/help/uk/pluma/figures(mate-text-editor), /usr/share/help/fi/pluma(mate-text-editor), /usr/share/pluma/plugins/snippets(mate-text-editor), /usr/share/help/de/pluma(mate-text-editor), /usr/share/help/pt_BR/pluma/figures(mate-text-editor), /usr/libexec/pluma (mate-text-editor), /usr/share/help/ar/pluma(mate-text-editor), /usr/lib64/pluma/plugins/snippets(mate-text-editor), /usr/share/help/de/pluma/figures(mate-text-editor), /usr/share/help/ca/pluma/figures(mate-text-editor), /usr/share/help/it/pluma(mate-text-editor) [ ]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise. [ ]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [ ]: Changelog in prescribed format. [ ]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [ ]: Development files must be in a -devel package [ ]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [ ]: glib-compile-schemas is run in %postun and %posttrans if package has *.gschema.xml files. Note: gschema file(s) in pluma [ ]: The spec file handles locales properly. [ ]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [ ]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [ ]: Package does not generate any conflict. [ ]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [ ]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [ ]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [ ]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [ ]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [ ]: update-desktop-database is invoked in %post and %postun if package contains desktop file(s) with a MimeType: entry. Note: desktop file(s) with MimeType entry in pluma [ ]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise. [ ]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [ ]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 30720 bytes in 3 files. [ ]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x]: Package installs a %{name}.desktop using desktop-file-install or desktop- file-validate if there is such a file. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package do not use a name that already exist [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local Python: [ ]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build process. [ ]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should provide egg info. [ ]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python [x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel [x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep ===== SHOULD items ===== Generic: [ ]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [ ]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [ ]: Package functions as described. [ ]: Latest version is packaged. [ ]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [ ]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [ ]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [ ]: %check is present and all tests pass. [ ]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: Dist tag is present (not strictly required in GL). [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable. [x]: Uses parallel make %{?_smp_mflags} macro. [x]: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files are correct. [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified. ===== EXTRA items ===== Generic: [!]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package is arched. Note: Arch-ed rpms have a total of 13731840 bytes in /usr/share pluma-1.7.1-1.fc21.x86_64.rpm:12861440 See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ReviewGuidelines#Package_Review_Guidelines [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM. Rpmlint ------- Checking: pluma-1.7.1-1.fc21.x86_64.rpm pluma-devel-1.7.1-1.fc21.x86_64.rpm pluma-1.7.1-1.fc21.src.rpm pluma.x86_64: E: explicit-lib-dependency mate-desktop-libs pluma.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary mate-text-editor pluma.src: W: strange-permission pluma-1.7.1.tar.xz 0600L pluma.src: W: invalid-url Source0: http://pub.mate-desktop.org/releases/1.7/%{name}-%{version}.tar.xz HTTP Error 400: Bad Request 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 3 warnings. Rpmlint (installed packages) ---------------------------- # rpmlint pluma-devel pluma pluma.x86_64: E: explicit-lib-dependency mate-desktop-libs pluma.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary mate-text-editor 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 1 warnings. # echo 'rpmlint-done:' Requires -------- pluma-devel (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): /usr/bin/pkg-config gtksourceview3-devel pkgconfig(gtksourceview-2.0) pluma(x86-64) pygtk2-devel pluma (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): /bin/bash /bin/sh /usr/bin/python caja-schemas libICE.so.6()(64bit) libSM.so.6()(64bit) libX11.so.6()(64bit) libatk-1.0.so.0()(64bit) libc.so.6()(64bit) libcairo.so.2()(64bit) libdl.so.2()(64bit) libenchant.so.1()(64bit) libfontconfig.so.1()(64bit) libfreetype.so.6()(64bit) libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgio-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libglib-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgmodule-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgobject-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgthread-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgtksourceview-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libm.so.6()(64bit) libpango-1.0.so.0()(64bit) libpangocairo-1.0.so.0()(64bit) libpangoft2-1.0.so.0()(64bit) libpthread.so.0()(64bit) libpython2.7.so.1.0()(64bit) libutil.so.1()(64bit) libxml2.so.2()(64bit) libxml2.so.2(LIBXML2_2.4.30)(64bit) libxml2.so.2(LIBXML2_2.5.0)(64bit) libxml2.so.2(LIBXML2_2.6.0)(64bit) mate-desktop-libs mate-dialogs pygobject2 pygtk2 pygtksourceview rtld(GNU_HASH) Provides -------- pluma-devel: mate-text-editor-devel mate-text-editor-devel(x86-64) pkgconfig(pluma) pluma-devel pluma-devel(x86-64) pluma: application() application(pluma.desktop) libchangecase.so()(64bit) libcloader.so()(64bit) libdocinfo.so()(64bit) libfilebrowser.so()(64bit) libmodelines.so()(64bit) libpythonloader.so()(64bit) libsort.so()(64bit) libspell.so()(64bit) libtaglist.so()(64bit) libtime.so()(64bit) mate-text-editor mate-text-editor(x86-64) mimehandler(text/plain) pluma pluma(x86-64) Unversioned so-files -------------------- pluma: /usr/lib64/pluma/plugin-loaders/libcloader.so pluma: /usr/lib64/pluma/plugin-loaders/libpythonloader.so pluma: /usr/lib64/pluma/plugins/libchangecase.so pluma: /usr/lib64/pluma/plugins/libdocinfo.so pluma: /usr/lib64/pluma/plugins/libfilebrowser.so pluma: /usr/lib64/pluma/plugins/libmodelines.so pluma: /usr/lib64/pluma/plugins/libsort.so pluma: /usr/lib64/pluma/plugins/libspell.so pluma: /usr/lib64/pluma/plugins/libtaglist.so pluma: /usr/lib64/pluma/plugins/libtime.so Source checksums ---------------- http://pub.mate-desktop.org/releases/1.7/pluma-1.7.1.tar.xz : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : 6f164ba7ad0e0660cc5a0c62688ddc899b76b462088ad22cae78e8da2f45aa70 CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 6f164ba7ad0e0660cc5a0c62688ddc899b76b462088ad22cae78e8da2f45aa70 Generated by fedora-review 0.5.1 (bb9bf27) last change: 2013-12-13 Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -b 1046726 Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64 Active plugins: Python, Generic, Shell-api, C/C++ Disabled plugins: Java, SugarActivity, fonts, Haskell, Ocaml, Perl, R, PHP, Ruby Disabled flags: EXARCH, EPEL5, BATCH, DISTTAG All done! * Thu Feb 13 2014 Wolfgang Ulbrich <chat-to-me> - 1.7.2-1 - update to 1.7.2 release - fix rpmlint warning 'can't find source0' - fix license information - use a joker for the man file attribute - move data in a noarch subpackage - improve obsoletes - update rpm scriplets Spec URL: http://raveit65.fedorapeople.org/Mate/SPECS/pluma.spec SRPM URL: http://raveit65.fedorapeople.org/Mate/SRPM/pluma-1.7.2-1.fc21.src.rpm Approved. New Package SCM Request ======================= Package Name: pluma Short Description: Text editor for the MATE desktop Owners: raveit65 vicodan Branches: InitialCC: Note: branch is empty because other branches than rawhide will use old package name until releases are EOL. Git done (by process-git-requests). Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: pluma New Branches: f20 Owners: raveit65 vicodan InitialCC: Git done (by process-git-requests). |