Bug 1047126
Summary: | Support for SEPA in aqbanking | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora EPEL | Reporter: | Markus Espenhain <markus.espenhain> |
Component: | aqbanking | Assignee: | Bill Nottingham <notting> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | el6 | CC: | markus.espenhain, notting, rdieter, redhat-bugzilla, robert.scheck, rvokal |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | gwenhywfar-4.9.0-0.2.beta.el6 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2014-01-21 05:54:20 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 1047200 |
Description
Markus Espenhain
2013-12-29 09:53:38 UTC
Not horribly enthused about using it when it's still marked 'beta'. Also, it's an ABI break, which means it's not really appropriate in general for an existing release, much less a long-term supported one. Bill, even I agree with you on the perspective of being a package maintainer as well, I would like to explicitly point out that DTAUS (one of the im-/ exporters of aqbanking) gets completely obsolete in Germany and superseeded by SEPA. In the consequence aqbanking in EPEL 5 and 6 is useless in Germany starting with 2014-02-01. Even aqbanking 5.2.0 is also marked as beta, I would like to see a switch to this newer version as well given that SEPA now does not only cover Germany, but the whole Single Euro Payments Area consisting out of 26 countries. That means any ABI breakage also introduces benefits for other users in Europe. According to two quick checks the amount of affected software in EPEL is not that huge: $ for p in $(repoquery --repoid epel -a --qf '%{base_package_name} %{name}' | awk '/^aqbanking /{print$2}' | sort -u); do repoquery --repoid epel -s --whatrequires $p && repoquery --repoid epel-source --arch=src --whatrequires $p; done | sed 's|-[^-]*-[^-]*$||' | sort -u | egrep -v "^aqbanking$" gnucash $ $ for p in $(repoquery --repoid epel -a --qf '%{base_package_name} %{name}' | awk '/^gwenhywfar /{print$2}' | sort -u); do repoquery --repoid epel -s --whatrequires $p && repoquery --repoid epel-source --arch=src --whatrequires $p; done | sed 's|-[^-]*-[^-]*$||' | sort -u | egrep -v "^gwenhywfar$" aqbanking gnucash $ In the end both, gwenhywfar and aqbanking should be updated - and one rebuild of gnucash is required. And I am quite sure that the gnucash users are really really happy to be able to use SEPA as well, no? Fair point. Although we'd need to do it in Fedora as well as EPEL, and there's one other user there (kmymoney). I am happy to assist if that helps somehow (especially for EPEL 5 and 6). 5? That's running (now) two major releases ago for GnuCash. Not sure it would even work with new aqbanking. I would just be planning 6 & 7. I was less thinking about gnucash but more about users doing batch runs using aqbanking directly (like we do). However my employer does not seem to have any production systems with aqbanking on 5 anymore. So we are fine with 6+. There's a build in rawhide (and EPEL 7) right now, if you want to smoketest the SEPA support before I start pulling it back to el6/19/20. gwenhywfar-4.9.0-0.2.beta.el6,aqbanking-5.3.2-0.1.beta.el6,gnucash-2.4.15-1.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gwenhywfar-4.9.0-0.2.beta.el6,aqbanking-5.3.2-0.1.beta.el6,gnucash-2.4.15-1.el6 kmymoney-4.6.4-3.fc19,gnucash-2.4.15-1.fc19,aqbanking-5.3.2-0.1.beta.fc19,gwenhywfar-4.9.0-0.2.beta.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/kmymoney-4.6.4-3.fc19,gnucash-2.4.15-1.fc19,aqbanking-5.3.2-0.1.beta.fc19,gwenhywfar-4.9.0-0.2.beta.fc19 gnucash-2.6.0-2.fc20,gnucash-docs-2.6.0-1.fc20,kmymoney-4.6.4-3.fc20,aqbanking-5.3.2-0.1.beta.fc20,gwenhywfar-4.9.0-0.2.beta.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gnucash-2.6.0-2.fc20,gnucash-docs-2.6.0-1.fc20,kmymoney-4.6.4-3.fc20,aqbanking-5.3.2-0.1.beta.fc20,gwenhywfar-4.9.0-0.2.beta.fc20 Package gwenhywfar-4.9.0-0.2.beta.el6, aqbanking-5.3.2-0.1.beta.el6, gnucash-2.4.15-1.el6: * should fix your issue, * was pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 testing repository, * should be available at your local mirror within two days. Update it with: # su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=epel-testing gwenhywfar-4.9.0-0.2.beta.el6 aqbanking-5.3.2-0.1.beta.el6 gnucash-2.4.15-1.el6' as soon as you are able to. Please go to the following url: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-0232/gwenhywfar-4.9.0-0.2.beta.el6,aqbanking-5.3.2-0.1.beta.el6,gnucash-2.4.15-1.el6 then log in and leave karma (feedback). gnucash-2.6.0-2.fc20, gnucash-docs-2.6.0-1.fc20, kmymoney-4.6.4-3.fc20, aqbanking-5.3.2-0.1.beta.fc20, gwenhywfar-4.9.0-0.2.beta.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. kmymoney-4.6.4-3.fc19, gnucash-2.4.15-1.fc19, aqbanking-5.3.2-0.1.beta.fc19, gwenhywfar-4.9.0-0.2.beta.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. gwenhywfar-4.9.0-0.2.beta.el6, aqbanking-5.3.2-0.1.beta.el6, gnucash-2.4.15-3.el6, gnucash-docs-2.4.3-1.el6, ktoblzcheck-1.44-1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. |