Bug 1047362

Summary:	Rawhide version of asciidoctor is older than f20 version
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Ken Dreyer <ktdreyer>
Component:	rubygem-asciidoctor	Assignee:	Vít Ondruch <vondruch>
Status:	CLOSED RAWHIDE	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	unspecified	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	rawhide	CC:	dallen, vondruch
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	rubygem-asciidoctor-0.1.4-1.fc21	Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2014-04-14 12:05:11 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Ken Dreyer 2013-12-30 16:44:54 UTC

0.1.4 is built and pushed to F19 and F20, but it is not in Rawhide. Please build 0.1.4 for Rawhide.

See https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1005 for information regarding why builds are no longer inherited "up" into Rawhide any more.

This affects the (future) packaging for rubygem-github-makeup in Rawhide. See https://github.com/github/markup/pull/235

Comment 1 Ken Dreyer 2013-12-30 16:45:58 UTC

er, meant to say "rubygem-github-markup" instead of "makeup" in comment #1 :)

Comment 2 Ken Dreyer 2014-02-07 03:38:06 UTC

Hi Dan, would you mind building 0.1.4 for Rawhide?

Comment 3 Ken Dreyer 2014-02-13 00:04:50 UTC

Hi Dan, I've applied for ACLs in pkgdb so I can update the package in Rawhide.

Comment 4 Ken Dreyer 2014-04-08 15:08:25 UTC

I've emailed Dan a couple times. He wants to approve my pkgdb request, but he reports that he doesn't currently have access to his FAS account.

Comment 5 Ken Dreyer 2014-04-09 23:32:47 UTC

Vít was kind enough to kick off a 0.1.4 build earlier this week: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=509850

Unfortunately that failed because the test suite is not compatible with Minitest 5 that went into Rawhide recently. I've posted a patch upstream for Minitest 5, at https://github.com/asciidoctor/asciidoctor/pull/937, and backported that patch to 0.1.4 for Fedora.

  * Tue Apr 08 2014 Ken Dreyer <ktdreyer> - 0.1.4-2
  - Patch to support Minitest 5

Exact changes in Git: http://fedorapeople.org/cgit/ktdreyer/public_git/rubygem-asciidoctor.git/ (This can just be fetched and pushed into Fedora's official dist-git.)

Spec URL: http://ktdreyer.fedorapeople.org/reviews/rubygem-asciidoctor.spec
SRPM URL: http://ktdreyer.fedorapeople.org/reviews/rubygem-asciidoctor-0.1.4-2.fc21.src.rpm

F21 scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6722221

Comment 6 Vít Ondruch 2014-04-14 12:05:11 UTC

Hi Ken,

Since I am not convinced, that upstream is likely to accept your patch, I decided to build asciidoctor in its current state with "BR: rubygem(minitest) < 5". Lets see how it evolves.

Comment 7 Ken Dreyer 2014-05-08 17:38:30 UTC

By the way, upstream did accept the minitest patch, so when the final release of asciidoctor v1.5.0 comes out, we can drop the "< 5" requirement on "BR: rubygem(minitest)".

Comment 8 Vít Ondruch 2014-05-09 07:35:59 UTC

(In reply to Ken Dreyer from comment #7)
> By the way, upstream did accept the minitest patch, so when the final
> release of asciidoctor v1.5.0 comes out, we can drop the "< 5" requirement
> on "BR: rubygem(minitest)".

Congrats! Sorry for being pessimistic ;)

Comment 9 Ken Dreyer 2014-05-09 15:53:54 UTC

No prob :) "Staying close to upstream" is why I like Fedora.

Comment 10 Red Hat Bugzilla 2023-09-14 01:56:11 UTC

The needinfo request[s] on this closed bug have been removed as they have been unresolved for 1000 days