Bug 1048617

Summary: lz4-r110-1 not built with $RPM_OPT_FLAGS
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Ville Skyttä <ville.skytta>
Component: lz4Assignee: pjp <pj.pandit>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: rawhideCC: pj.pandit
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: Patch
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: lz4-r116-1.fc20 Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2014-04-29 05:20:33 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 496968    
Attachments:
Description Flags
Build with $RPM_OPT_FLAGS none

Description Ville Skyttä 2014-01-05 21:46:34 UTC
Created attachment 845835 [details]
Build with $RPM_OPT_FLAGS

Fix attached, let me know if you'd like me to push and build this for devel.

Comment 1 pjp 2014-03-16 12:58:16 UTC
  Hello Ville,

Thanks so much for the patch. It'll help if you send the Makefile patch to the upstream developer. I've made the relevant changes to the spec file to export CFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" before make %{?_smp_mflags}.

Thank you.

Comment 2 Ville Skyttä 2014-03-16 13:14:49 UTC
(In reply to pjp from comment #1)
> It'll help if you send the Makefile patch to the upstream developer.

As noted in the patch I attached here, already done.
https://code.google.com/p/lz4/issues/detail?id=106

> I've made the relevant changes to the spec file to
> export CFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" before make %{?_smp_mflags}.

I suggest also applying the actual lz4-cflags.patch, otherwise the specfile modifications make no difference. Note that Bugzilla fails to show the embedded lz4-cflags.patch in some of its patch views, but it is visible e.g. here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=845835 (The easiest thing for you would have been to just "git am" that one...)

Comment 3 pjp 2014-03-16 17:14:10 UTC
(In reply to Ville Skyttä from comment #2)
> As noted in the patch I attached here, already done.
> https://code.google.com/p/lz4/issues/detail?id=106

  Strange! He says it was merged in r111, but r114 Makefile still has

CFLAGS+= -I. -std=c99 -O3 -Wall -W -Wundef -DLZ4_VERSION=\"$(RELEASE)\"

Maybe the change was reverted in subsequent releases.
 
> I suggest also applying the actual lz4-cflags.patch, otherwise the specfile
> modifications make no difference. Note that Bugzilla fails to show the
> embedded lz4-cflags.patch in some of its patch views, but it is visible e.g.
> here:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=845835

  Yes, I did see the attached patch. If it is merged upstream, we don't need to apply lz4-cflags.patch in the spec file.

Comment 4 Ville Skyttä 2014-03-17 08:44:06 UTC
(In reply to pjp from comment #3)
> (In reply to Ville Skyttä from comment #2)
> > As noted in the patch I attached here, already done.
> > https://code.google.com/p/lz4/issues/detail?id=106
> 
>   Strange! He says it was merged in r111, but r114 Makefile still has
> 
> CFLAGS+= -I. -std=c99 -O3 -Wall -W -Wundef -DLZ4_VERSION=\"$(RELEASE)\"

But that's fine. Note the plus in +=, it's just an alternative (possibly better) way of accomplishing the same thing that was in my original patch.

Comment 5 pjp 2014-03-17 08:54:18 UTC
(In reply to Ville Skyttä from comment #4)
> But that's fine. Note the plus in +=, it's just an alternative (possibly
> better) way of accomplishing the same thing that was in my original patch.

  Ah yep. I missed your second comment there.

Thank you.

Comment 6 Fedora Update System 2014-04-14 06:12:59 UTC
lz4-r116-1.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/lz4-r116-1.fc19

Comment 7 Fedora Update System 2014-04-14 06:13:07 UTC
lz4-r116-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/lz4-r116-1.fc20

Comment 8 Fedora Update System 2014-04-15 15:42:18 UTC
Package lz4-r116-1.fc20:
* should fix your issue,
* was pushed to the Fedora 20 testing repository,
* should be available at your local mirror within two days.
Update it with:
# su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing lz4-r116-1.fc20'
as soon as you are able to.
Please go to the following url:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-5128/lz4-r116-1.fc20
then log in and leave karma (feedback).

Comment 9 Fedora Update System 2014-04-29 05:20:33 UTC
lz4-r116-1.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

Comment 10 Fedora Update System 2014-04-29 05:22:15 UTC
lz4-r116-1.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.