Bug 1050968

Summary:	[RFE] oscap-anaconda-addon: Use services of gtk.RecentManager to store the recent SCAP content URIs
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Jan Lieskovsky <jlieskov>
Component:	oscap-anaconda-addon	Assignee:	Vratislav Podzimek <vpodzime>
Status:	CLOSED CANTFIX	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	unspecified	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	20	CC:	pvrabec, vpodzime
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2014-01-09 14:36:26 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Jan Lieskovsky 2014-01-09 12:51:10 UTC

Description of problem:

oscap-anaconda-addon allows to confine final installed Fedora instance via remotely retrieved SCAP content. The SCAP content can be specified via HTTP or HTTPS protocols.

It would be a nice feature to have if the Gtk.Entry holding the remote SCAP content URI could utilize the services of gtk.RecentManager to for automated completion / selection one entry from the list of previously used / entered ones.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
oscap-anaconda-addon-0.3-1.fc20

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Try to install Fedora install image equipped with oscap-anaconda-addon
2. Enter some remote SCAP content URL
3. Abort the installation, retry again (with same boot image)

Actual results:
Previously used SCAP content URL is not suggested / auto-completed.

Expected results:
Previously used SCAP content URL is automatically suggested / completed.

Additional info:
Actually not sure this would be implementable (if Anaconda install iso process isn't in some way exceptional wrt to other standalone running Gtk applications).

But if it's possible, it would be nice to have it.

Comment 1 Vratislav Podzimek 2014-01-09 14:36:26 UTC

There is no writable space the addon could use to write out such URIs.

Comment 2 Jan Lieskovsky 2014-01-09 15:50:22 UTC

(In reply to Vratislav Podzimek from comment #1)
> There is no writable space the addon could use to write out such URIs.

That's what I was afraid of when mentioning not sure if this would be implementable. Nevermind, thanks for checking this.