Bug 1051536
Summary: | Lucene 4.7.0 is available | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Michael Simacek <msimacek> | ||||
Component: | lucene | Assignee: | Michael Simacek <msimacek> | ||||
Status: | CLOSED RAWHIDE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> | ||||
Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |||||
Priority: | unspecified | ||||||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | akurtako, hicham.haouari, java-sig-commits, jerboaa, krzysztof.daniel, pbrobinson, puntogil, sgehwolf, sochotni | ||||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||||||
Target Release: | --- | ||||||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||||||
OS: | Unspecified | ||||||
Whiteboard: | |||||||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |||||
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||
Last Closed: | 2014-03-04 19:43:41 UTC | Type: | Bug | ||||
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||
Embargoed: | |||||||
Bug Depends On: | 1002154, 1002157, 1002170, 1005782, 1005792 | ||||||
Bug Blocks: | 1025904 | ||||||
Attachments: |
|
Description
Michael Simacek
2014-01-10 14:39:30 UTC
can merge my work [1] in lucene package? creating a sub package e.g. -n solr ... [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1025904 (In reply to gil cattaneo from comment #1) > can merge my work [1] in lucene package? > creating a sub package e.g. -n solr ... > > [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1025904 Apache Solr is a different/dependent project and should be a separate SRPM and not a subpackage Solr is buildable and is designed according to the same version of Lucene the advantages for use source solr package are: - a perfect sync with the both projects - usage of maven builder tools, simplified the packaging (In reply to gil cattaneo from comment #3) > Solr is buildable and is designed according to the same version of Lucene > the advantages for use source solr package are: > - a perfect sync with the both projects > - usage of maven builder tools, simplified the packaging You would package solr as a separate package that uses lucene. Just because it uses lucene doesn't mean it should be packaged with lucene. You should package it separately just like any other package that depends on other bits (In reply to gil cattaneo from comment #3) > Solr is buildable and is designed according to the same version of Lucene Gil: it seems you've already submitted a RR for solr: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1025904 Created attachment 861535 [details]
Update to upstream version 4.6.1
Current state of the update:
All dependencies are already in rawhide.
It is buildable with tests disabled and seems to work.
Tests throw exception at the end due to the build creating too many threads (reported as #1063301). But they should pass except those explicitly deleted - some using old APIs and one regression due to old version of nekohtml.
Dependent packages:
eclipse-m2e-core, hibernate-search, infinispan, maven-indexer, solr3 - don't build because of API changes
eclipse - unsatisfiable dependency problem, it is caused by this update, but the output doesn't contain anything lucene related, I don't know the reason yet
h2 - has hardcoded classpath, should be easily patched
eclipse-mylyn, opengrok, thermostat - didn't build regardless of lucene version
hibernate-hql, pdfbox, wildfly - built fine
(In reply to Michael Simacek from comment #6) > eclipse-mylyn, opengrok, thermostat - didn't build regardless of lucene Thermostat now builds in rawhide with old 3.x lucene (thermostat-1.0.0-3.fc21). lucene-4.7.0 is now available in rawhide |