Bug 1051676

Summary:	[GSS] (6.2.x) Upgrade Mojarra 2.1.19 to 2.1.27
Product:	[JBoss] JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 6	Reporter:	ivassile
Component:	JSF	Assignee:	Vaclav Tunka <vtunka>
Status:	CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE	QA Contact:	Tomas Remes <tremes>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	6.2.0	CC:	bmaxwell, cdewolf, dosoudil, jawilson, smumford, vtunka, yyang
Target Milestone:	CR2
Target Release:	EAP 6.2.2
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2014-06-02 12:50:36 UTC	Type:	Component Upgrade
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:	1051652, 1051674
Bug Blocks:	1049365

Description ivassile 2014-01-10 20:57:50 UTC

Upgrade the JSF implementation (api and impl) to version 2.1.27.

Comment 5 ivassile 2014-01-13 16:22:42 UTC

Updated "Target Relaease: 6.2.2"

Comment 6 Yong Yang 2014-02-14 02:38:22 UTC

JSF api&impl have been updated to 2.1.27 for EAP 6.2.2.

FYI:
glassfish-jsf-eap6-2.1.27-6.redhat_8.1.ep6.el6, https://brewweb.devel.redhat.com/buildinfo?buildID=335589

jboss-jsf-api_2.1_spec-2.1.27-2.Final_redhat_1.1.ep6.el6, https://brewweb.devel.redhat.com/buildinfo?buildID=327715

Comment 7 Marek Schmidt 2014-02-14 15:15:52 UTC

I don't recall any QA ack for upgrading Mojarra to 2.1.27 in 6.2.x. It is quite a large set of changes for a CP, so I'd prefer to have it in 6.3 only.  Have a backport with only the required fixes been considered?

Comment 8 ivassile 2014-02-14 15:37:52 UTC

They are two cases [1][2] (two different issues) waiting on this upgrade. We've already promised specifically Mojarra 2.1.27 in EAP 6.2. The customer on case 00980270 [1]  expected  2.1.27 in EAP 6.2.1 (Patch Update 1) and we recently apologized for the delay and confirmed that JSF 2.1.27 will be included in 6.2.2 (Patch Update 2). 

[1] https://access.redhat.com/support/cases/00980270/
[2] https://access.redhat.com/support/cases/01000701/

Comment 11 Tomas Remes 2014-03-04 08:38:28 UTC

Verified in 6.2.2.CP.CR2.