Bug 1051985
Summary: | btrfs-progs: btrfs scrub returns non-zero but reports no errors | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 | Reporter: | Eryu Guan <eguan> | ||||
Component: | btrfs-progs | Assignee: | fs-maint | ||||
Status: | CLOSED DUPLICATE | QA Contact: | Filesystem QE <fs-qe> | ||||
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |||||
Priority: | medium | ||||||
Version: | 7.0 | CC: | esandeen, wangsl.fnst | ||||
Target Milestone: | rc | ||||||
Target Release: | --- | ||||||
Hardware: | All | ||||||
OS: | Linux | ||||||
Whiteboard: | |||||||
Fixed In Version: | btrfs-progs-3.16-1.el7 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | ||||
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||
Last Closed: | 2014-10-15 23:13:31 UTC | Type: | Bug | ||||
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||
Embargoed: | |||||||
Attachments: |
|
Description
Eryu Guan
2014-01-13 03:32:41 UTC
1. mkfs -t btrfs -m raid0 -d raid0 -f -K /dev/loop{0..3} 2. mount /dev/loop0 /mnt/btrfs 3. btrfs fi balance start -mconvert=raid5 -dconvert=raid5 /mnt/btrfs 4. btrfs scrub start -B /mnt/btrfs Still fails with btrfs-progs-3.12-4.el7 Created attachment 877550 [details]
Bug fix for your problem
(In reply to Wang Shilong from comment #2) > Created attachment 877550 [details] > Bug fix for your problem This patch can be applied to btrfs-next, and it should can fix your problem, i'd like you can test it before i send this patch out to list. Thanks for reporting. Note, FJ has sent a patchset for this: [PATCH 1/4] btrfs-progs: adjust the return values for scrub Fixed in v3.16 with: 965cd86 btrfs-progs: adjust the return values for scrub Closing this and others with NEXTRELEASE since it's part of a rebase, but if you prefer we can re-open, get all the acks, and add it to the errata. I'm not sure if that's worth it, but if you want to, please let me know. Thanks, -Eric Actually, probably better to dup to the rebase bug. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1134981 *** |