Bug 1052369
Summary: | df does not show all mounted partitions | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | tgxqojko | ||||||
Component: | coreutils | Assignee: | Ondrej Vasik <ovasik> | ||||||
Status: | CLOSED DUPLICATE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> | ||||||
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |||||||
Priority: | unspecified | ||||||||
Version: | 20 | CC: | admiller, kdudka, kzak, ooprala, ovasik, p, tgxqojko, twaugh | ||||||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||||||||
Target Release: | --- | ||||||||
Hardware: | x86_64 | ||||||||
OS: | Linux | ||||||||
Whiteboard: | |||||||||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |||||||
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||||
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||||
Last Closed: | 2014-01-15 07:13:56 UTC | Type: | Bug | ||||||
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||||
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||||
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||||
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||||
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||||
Embargoed: | |||||||||
Attachments: |
|
Description
tgxqojko
2014-01-13 17:36:06 UTC
Due to the change in the /etc/mtab (instead of simple tab of mounted partitions it is now symlink to /proc/mounts), there is a lot of duplicates in this tab. Therefore, df is trying to reduce the duplicates based on some mechanism - you can get all of the mountpoints using df -a . Can you please check: 1) Do they appear in df -a? 2) Provide strace of both df -a and df , if the mountpoint is available in df -a ? TIA. Created attachment 849888 [details]
strace df
Created attachment 849889 [details]
strace df -a
1) both appear with df -a 2) attached strace output Thanks, based on the same 1K-blocks size for both mounts, it looks like they have the same device id, right? This is probably the reason for filtering. I'll close it as duplicate of https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=920806 - as the issue is already there and you are hitting the same issue. The best way would probably be not suppressing duplicates for remote filesystems. It is on our todo list, but will take some time. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 920806 *** |