Bug 105397
Summary: | e1000 nic does not work properly under a 2.4.20 kernel | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Retired] Red Hat Linux | Reporter: | Brett Oster <boster> |
Component: | kernel | Assignee: | Jeff Garzik <jgarzik> |
Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | |
Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | high | ||
Version: | 9 | CC: | peterm, riel, scott.feldman |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | i686 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2004-06-11 18:17:50 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Brett Oster
2003-09-25 18:20:15 UTC
more information: dmesg under a 2.4.20 kernel contains these lines: PCI: 0d:06.0 PCI cache line size set incorrectly (64 bytes) by BIOS/FW. PCI: 0d:06.0 PCI cache line size corrected to 128. dmesg under 2.4.18 has about 6 of these: PCI: 0d:06.0 PCI cache line size set incorrectly (64 bytes) by BIOS/FW, expecting 32 diff -urNp linux-10010/arch/i386/config.in linux-10020/arch/i386/config.in --- linux-10010/arch/i386/config.in +++ linux-10020/arch/i386/config.in @@ -98,7 +98,7 @@ if [ "$CONFIG_M586MMX" = "y" ]; then define_bool CONFIG_X86_F00F_WORKS_OK n fi if [ "$CONFIG_M686" = "y" ]; then - define_int CONFIG_X86_L1_CACHE_SHIFT 5 + define_int CONFIG_X86_L1_CACHE_SHIFT 7 define_bool CONFIG_X86_HAS_TSC y define_bool CONFIG_X86_GOOD_APIC y define_bool CONFIG_X86_PGE y @@ -107,7 +107,7 @@ if [ "$CONFIG_M686" = "y" ]; then define_bool CONFIG_X86_F00F_WORKS_OK y fi if [ "$CONFIG_MPENTIUMIII" = "y" ]; then - define_int CONFIG_X86_L1_CACHE_SHIFT 5 + define_int CONFIG_X86_L1_CACHE_SHIFT 7 define_bool CONFIG_X86_HAS_TSC y define_bool CONFIG_X86_GOOD_APIC y define_bool CONFIG_X86_PGE y this broke it. the cards were somesort of pre-production oem samples that a company sold to us. They worked under single proc amd workstations, but not under the intel boxes. please close this bug. |