Bug 1055033

Summary:	[RFE][horizon]: Preset the "Devize size" field in the "Launch Instance" form with the min_disk properties
Product:	Red Hat OpenStack	Reporter:	RHOS Integration <rhos-integ>
Component:	python-django-horizon	Assignee:	RHOS Maint <rhos-maint>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	Ami Jeain <ajeain>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	unspecified	CC:	aberezin, aortega, eglynn, fpercoco, iovadia, jpichon, jruzicka, markmc, mrunge, yeylon
Target Milestone:	Upstream M3	Keywords:	FutureFeature
Target Release:	5.0 (RHEL 7)
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
URL:	https://blueprints.launchpad.net/horizon/+spec/prefill-create-a-new-volume-device-size-min-requirements
Whiteboard:	upstream_milestone_icehouse-3 upstream_status_implemented upstream_definition_approved
Fixed In Version:	python-django-horizon-2014.1-5.el7ost	Doc Type:	Enhancement
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2014-07-08 15:41:16 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description RHOS Integration 2014-01-18 05:04:58 UTC

Cloned from launchpad blueprint https://blueprints.launchpad.net/horizon/+spec/prefill-create-a-new-volume-device-size-min-requirements.

Description:

In the "Launch Instance" form/wizard, when selecting "Boot from image (creates a new volume)" or "Boot from volume snapshot (creates a new volume), the "Device size" field should be prefilled with the highest value among the "min_disk" properties of the image, the flavor's size or the snapshot's size.


Specification URL (additional information):

None

Comment 2 Ido Ovadia 2014-06-10 11:59:43 UTC

There is a difference between RFE and launchpad blueprint.
In my point of view the RFE is the accurate, but it behaves lake the lauchpad.

Comment 3 Matthias Runge 2014-06-11 07:47:20 UTC

Ido, 
in theory, there is no difference between an RFE and a blueprint. Or the rfe should be covered by a blueprint.

But: we're tracking progress here with TWO systems, upstream deosn't care about Red Hat bugzilla. For Upstream, it's important what's covered by a blueprint in launchpad (and later in storyboard). 

I believe, there is a bug with the integration or sync job: the bz ticket is not changed, if the text of a blueprint was edited.

Comment 5 errata-xmlrpc 2014-07-08 15:41:16 UTC

Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2014-0855.html