Bug 1056526
Summary: | Sssd dynamic DNS update is not robust | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 | Reporter: | Nikolai Kondrashov <nikolai.kondrashov> |
Component: | sssd | Assignee: | SSSD Maintainers <sssd-maint> |
Status: | CLOSED UPSTREAM | QA Contact: | Namita Soman <nsoman> |
Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | 7.0 | CC: | dpal, grajaiya, jgalipea, jhrozek, lslebodn, mkosek, pbrezina, pspacek |
Target Milestone: | rc | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2016-11-23 13:07:21 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Nikolai Kondrashov
2014-01-22 11:32:51 UTC
Note for potential implementation - http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1536#section-1 : [...] Both name servers and stub resolvers should, therefore, implement some kind of a retransmission policy based on round trip time estimates of the name servers. The client should back-off exponentially, probably to a maximum timeout value. [...] Note that nsupdate, by default, seem to do 3 attempts to do the update, with 3 seconds in between. So, sssd shouldn't do it, but indeed some exponential retry scheme might be used instead. I'm not against three successive attempts with timeout = 3 seconds but then the timeout raise exponentially. Upstream ticket: https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/2206 Makes sense, but not too urgent for 7.3 Since this problem is already tracked in an upstream ticket and this bugzilla is not being planned for any immediate release either in RHEL or upstream, I'm closing this bugzilla with the resolution UPSTREAM. Please reopen this bugzilla report if you disagree. |